Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32889837›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2020

Survivors' Perceptions of Quality of Colorectal Cancer Care by Sexual Orientation.

Ulrike Boehmer, Melissa A Clark, Al Ozonoff, Michael Winter, Jennifer Potter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sexual minority-specific experiences of colorectal cancer survivors.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Follow-up surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors of different sexual orientations.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ulrike BoehmerDepartment of Community Health.
Melissa A ClarkDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Al OzonoffHarvard Medical School.
Michael WinterBiostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health.
Jennifer PotterHarvard Medical School.

Funding

Variations in Needs after Colorectal Cancer DiagnosisR01CA181392 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BOEHMER, ULRIKE · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess sexual minority and heterosexual survivors' perceived quality of cancer care and identify demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics associated with patient-centered quality of care. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour cancer registries provided data on 17,849 individuals who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer an average of 3 years prior and resided in predetermined diverse geographic areas. A questionnaire, which queried about sexual orientation and other eligibility criteria was mailed to all cancer survivors. Of these, 480 eligible survivors participated in a telephone survey. Quality of cancer care was defined by 3 measures of interpersonal care (physician communication, nursing care, and coordination of care) and by rating cancer care as excellent. We used generalized linear models and logistic regression with forward selection to obtain models that best explained each quality of care measure.

resultsSexual minority survivors rated physician communication, nursing care, and coordination of care similarly to heterosexual survivors, yet a significantly higher percentage of sexual minority survivors rated the overall quality of their cancer care as excellent (59% vs. 49%). Sexual minority survivors' greater likelihood of reporting excellent care remained unchanged after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics.

conclusionsSexual minority survivors' ratings of quality of colorectal cancer care were comparable or even higher than heterosexual survivors. Sexual minority survivors' reports of excellent care were not explained by their interpersonal care experiences.

Indexed as

AdultCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationCritical PathwaysFemaleHealth Care SurveysHeterosexualityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing CarePhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareRegistriesSexual and Gender Minorities

Identifiers

PMID32889837
PMCPMC8011297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.