ArticleRadiology and oncology2020
Adrenal vein sampling for primary aldosteronism: a 15-year national referral center experience.
Article in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adrenal Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism: Recommendations From the Australian and New Zealand Working Group.Clinical endocrinology · 2025Guideline
- Partially Successful Adrenal Vein Sampling With and Without Cross-Sectional Imaging in Primary Aldosteronism Subtyping.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- High-gradient magnetic separation chip-based small extracellular vesicle isolation for noninvasive subtyping of primary aldosteronism.Science advances · 2026Article
- Clinical prediction model for primary aldosteronism subtyping and special focus on adrenal volumetric assessment.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2024Article
- A clinical decision model for failed adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Intraprocedural cortisol testing improves adrenal vein cannulation success and diagnostic accuracy in assessment of primary aldosteronism, in a medium throughput centre.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Article
- The Entity of Connshing Syndrome: Primary Aldosteronism with Autonomous Cortisol Secretion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cost-effectiveness of adrenal vein sampling- vs computed tomography-guided adrenalectomy for unilateral adrenaloma in primary aldosteronism.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Article
- Validation of three novel clinical prediction tools for primary aldosteronism subtyping.Endocrine connections · 2022Article
- Adrenal vein sampling: technique and protocol, a systematic review.CVIR endovascular · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is essential for diagnostics of primary aldosteronism, distinguishing unilateral from bilateral disease and determining treatment options. We reviewed the performance of AVS for primary aldosteronism at our center during first 15 years, comparing the initial period to the period after the introduction of a dedicated radiologist. Additionally, AVS outcomes were checked against CT findings and the proportion of operated patients with proven unilateral disease was estimated. Patients and methods A retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the national endocrine referral center included all patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent AVS after its introduction in 2004 until the end of 2018. AVS was performed sequentially during Synacthen infusion. When the ratio of cortisol concentrations from adrenal vein and inferior vena cava was at least 5, AVS was considered successful. Results Data from 235 patients were examined (168 men; age 32-73, median 56 years; BMI 18-48, median 30.4 kg/ m2). Average number of annual AVS procedures increased from 7 in the 2004-2011 period to 29 in the 2012-2018 period (p < 0.001). AVS had to be repeated in 10% of procedures; it was successful in 77% of procedures and 86% of patients. The proportion of patients with successful AVS (92% in 2012-2018 vs. 66% in 2004-2011, p < 0.001) and of successful AVS procedures (82% vs. 61%, p < 0.001) was statistically significantly higher in the recent period. Conclusions Number of AVS procedures and success rate at our center increased over time. Introduction of a dedicated radiologist and technical advance expanded and improved the AVS practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.