Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32889774›Full record

SynthesisPhysiological reports2020

Muscle hypertrophy and ladder-based resistance training for rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ítalo Lourenço, Walter Krause Neto, Laura Dos Santos Portella Amorim, Vagner Moraes Munhoz Ortiz, Vitor Lopes Geraldo, Gabriel Henrique da Silva Ferreira, Érico Chagas Caperuto, Eliane Florencio Gama

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. βFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ítalo LourençoDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Walter Krause NetoDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-0208
Laura Dos Santos Portella AmorimDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vagner Moraes Munhoz OrtizDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Vitor Lopes GeraldoDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gabriel Henrique da Silva FerreiraDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Érico Chagas CaperutoDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Human Moviment, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-7506
Eliane Florencio GamaDepartment of Physical Education, Laboratory of Morphoquantitative Studies and Immunohistochemistry, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-8819
Universidade São Judas Tadeu · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to review the effects of ladder-based resistance training (LRT) on muscle hypertrophy and strength in rodents through a systematic review with meta-analysis. We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, SportDiscuss, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Scielo database on May 18, 2020. Thirty-four studies were included measuring total (mCSA) or mean muscle fibers cross-sectional area (fCSA) or maximum load-carrying capacity (MLCC) or muscle mass (MM). About the main results, LRT provides sufficient mechanical stimulation to increase mCSA and fCSA. Meta-analysis showed a significant overall effect on the fCSA (SMD 1.89, 95% CI [1.18, 2.61], p < .00001, I

Indexed as

AnimalsHypertrophyMiceMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical Conditioning, AnimalRatscross-sectional areaexerciseratsskeletal musclestrength training

Identifiers

PMID32889774
PMCPMC7507488
OpenAlexW3083308564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.