Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2021
Six- and Twelve-Month Follow-up Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a CBT-Based Group Course.
Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a school-based intervention on levels of anxiety and depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the MindPower program in ten high schools in Norway.BMC psychology · 2022Trial
- Reducing anxiety symptoms in adolescents with pre-existing depression: results from a randomized control trial.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2024Review
- Efficacy of the Mental Health App Intellect to Reduce Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial With a 1-Month Follow-up.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current study, we examined the durability of intervention gains over a 6- and 12-month follow-up period after the implementation of a CBT-based group intervention "Adolescent Coping with Depression Course" (ACDC) for adolescents with subclinical or mild-to-moderate depression. Data were collected from 228 youth, 133 of whom were allocated to the 14-week ACDC intervention and 95 to the usual care (UC) control condition. Analyses for the main outcome variable of depressive symptoms were performed using a random effects repeated measures piecewise growth model to estimate trajectory shape over time on an intention-to-treat basis. Results revealed that the reduction in depressive symptoms achieved during the intervention phase continued across the follow-up period for both ACDC and UC (i.e., depressive symptoms showed a significantly decreasing trend in both groups in intervention and follow-up phases); however, no differential effects between conditions were found during the follow-up phase. The direct and indirect effects of the intervention on the other outcome variables' follow-up results were also presented. ISRCTN registry ISRCTN19700389. Registered 6 October 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN19700389 . Full Protocol: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0954-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32889703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.