Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32889681›Full record

ReviewGenes & genomics2020

Cellular and molecular mechanisms of DEET toxicity and disease-carrying insect vectors: a review.

Bhanu Shrestha, Youngseok Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pest risk assessment ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Insects · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhanu ShresthaInterdisciplinary Program for Bio-Health Convergence, Kookmin University, 77, Jeongneung-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02707, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2945-2305
Youngseok LeeInterdisciplinary Program for Bio-Health Convergence, Kookmin University, 77, Jeongneung-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02707, Republic of Korea. ylee@kookmin.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0459-1138
Kookmin University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Education NRF-2018R1A2B6004202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral insects such as mosquitoes, flies, ticks, fleas, lice, and mites are known to serve as vectors for a vast number of pathogens. Many such vectors are hematophagous, and therefore introduce pathogens directly into the host's bloodstream. Importantly, the capacity of these vectors to spread disease can lead to serious global health crises. Furthermore, crop damage can be exacerbated by pathogen infection and increased insect foraging due to recent global warming.

methodsOur study categorized insect-associated damage into three groups: animal infection, plant infection, and direct crop damage due to insect foraging. To manage these problems, insect repellents and pesticides have been developed, among which DEET is the most broadly used and studied pest control agent. This review discusses the mode of action and possible mechanisms of DEET action, including olfactory and gustatory mechanisms and central nervous system impairment.

conclusionTo protect humans from malaria, yellow fever, dengue fever, zika, and filariasis, as well as to reduce economic losses associated with crop damage, considerably more efforts are needed to characterize the interactions between insects and insect repellents/pesticides to develop more potent pest control agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsDEETHumansInsectaInsect RepellentsInsect VectorsZika VirusZika Virus InfectionDEETInsect RepellentsAntifeedantDEETInsectPesticideRepellentVector

Identifiers

PMID32889681
OpenAlexW3083461212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.