Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32889522›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Drivers of stunting reduction in Nepal: a country case study.

Kaitlin Conway, Nadia Akseer, Raj Kumar Subedi, Samanpreet Brar, Basudev Bhattarai, Raja Ram Dhungana, Muhammad Islam, Anustha Mainali, Nikita Pradhan, Hana Tasic and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kaitlin ConwayCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Nadia AkseerCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Raj Kumar SubediNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Samanpreet BrarCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Basudev BhattaraiNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Raja Ram DhunganaNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Muhammad IslamCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Anustha MainaliNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nikita PradhanNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Hana TasicCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Dip Narayan ThakurNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jannah WigleCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Mahesh MaskeyNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic child malnutrition represents a serious global health concern. Over the last several decades, Nepal has seen a significant decline in linear growth stunting - a physical manifestation of chronic malnutrition - despite only modest economic growth and significant political instability.

objectiveThis study aimed to conduct an in-depth assessment of the determinants of stunting reduction in Nepal from 1996 to 2016, with specific attention paid to national-, community-, household-, and individual-level factors, as well as relevant nutrition-specific and -sensitive initiatives rolled out within the country.

methodsUsing a mixed-methods approach, 4 types of inquiry were employed: 1) a systematic review of published peer-reviewed and gray literature; 2) retrospective quantitative data analyses using Demographic and Health Surveys from 1996 to 2016; 3) a review of key nutrition-specific and -sensitive policies and programs; and 4) retrospective qualitative data collection and analyses.

resultsMean height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) improved by 0.94 SDs from 1996 to 2016. Subnational variation and socioeconomic inequalities in stunting outcomes persisted, with the latter widening over time. Decomposition analysis for children aged under 5 y explained 90.9% of the predicted change in HAZ, with key factors including parental education (24.7%), maternal nutrition (19.3%), reduced open defecation (12.3%), maternal and newborn health care (11.5%), and economic improvement (9.0%). Key initiatives focused on decentralizing the health system and mobilizing community health workers to increase accessibility; long-standing nationwide provision of basic health interventions; targeted efforts to improve maternal and child health; and the prioritization of nutrition-sensitive initiatives by both government and donors. National and community stakeholders and mothers at village level highlighted a mixture of poverty reduction, access to health services, improved education, and increased access to water, sanitation, and hygiene as drivers of stunting reduction.

conclusionsImprovements in both nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive sectors have been critical to Nepal's stunting decline, particularly in the areas of poverty reduction, health, education, and sanitation.

Indexed as

Child Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansHygieneInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNepalNutritional StatusPovertyRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorschildrenHAZlinear growthmixed methodsNepalnutritionSouth Asiastuntingunder-5

Identifiers

PMID32889522
PMCPMC7487432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.