ReviewHeart failure clinics2020
Innovation in Ambulatory Care of Heart Failure in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Review in Heart failure clinics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The detection of cardiovascular biomarkers in dermal interstitial fluid - a step to real-time monitoring.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Remote Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Effect of Entresto on Clinical Symptoms, Ventricular Remodeling, Rehabilitation, and Hospitalization Rate in Patients with Both Acute Myocardial Infarction and Acute Heart Failure.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Why Automated E-Counseling for Chronic Heart Failure Matters in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.Circulation. Heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite steady progress over the past 3 decades in advancing drug and device therapies to reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, large registries of usual care demonstrate incomplete use of these evidence-based therapies in clinical practice. Potential strategies to improve guideline-directed medical therapy include leveraging non-physician clinicians, solidifying transitions of care, incorporating telehealth solutions, and engaging in comprehensive comorbid disease management via multidisciplinary team structures. These approaches may be particularly relevant in an era of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and associated need for social distancing, further limiting contact with traditional ambulatory clinic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.