Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32888488›Full record

Observational studyCurrent biology : CB2020

Recurrent Processing Drives Perceptual Plasticity.

Ke Jia, Elisa Zamboni, Valentin Kemper, Catarina Rua, Nuno Reis Goncalves, Adrian Ka Tsun Ng, Christopher T Rodgers, Guy Williams, Rainer Goebel, Zoe Kourtzi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Expectation Cues and False Percepts Generate Stimulus-Specific Activity in Distinct Layers of the Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Priority coding in the visual system.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ke JiaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Elisa ZamboniDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Valentin KemperDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 ER, The Netherlands.
Catarina RuaWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Nuno Reis GoncalvesDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Adrian Ka Tsun NgDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK; Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Christopher T RodgersWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Guy WilliamsWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6229 ER, The Netherlands.
Zoe KourtziDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK. Electronic address: zk240@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P021255/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council H012508Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/M008983/1Wellcome Trust 098436/Z/12/BWellcome Trust 205067/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning and experience are critical for translating ambiguous sensory information from our environments to perceptual decisions. Yet evidence on how training molds the adult human brain remains controversial, as fMRI at standard resolution does not allow us to discern the finer scale mechanisms that underlie sensory plasticity. Here, we combine ultra-high-field (7T) functional imaging at sub-millimeter resolution with orientation discrimination training to interrogate experience-dependent plasticity across cortical depths that are known to support dissociable brain computations. We demonstrate that learning alters orientation-specific representations in superficial rather than middle or deeper V1 layers, consistent with recurrent plasticity mechanisms via horizontal connections. Further, learning increases feedforward rather than feedback layer-to-layer connectivity in occipito-parietal regions, suggesting that sensory plasticity gates perceptual decisions. Our findings reveal finer scale plasticity mechanisms that re-weight sensory signals to inform improved decisions, bridging the gap between micro- and macro-circuits of experience-dependent plasticity.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronal PlasticityOrientation, SpatialPhotic StimulationSpatial LearningVisual CortexVisual PerceptionYoung Adultexperience-dependent plasticitylayer-to-layer functional connectivitylearningperceptual decisionsultra-high-field brain imagingvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID32888488
PMCPMC7658806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.