Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32888341›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Outcomes after resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after high-grade immune-mediated hepatitis.

Michael Li, Jordan S Sack, Osama E Rahma, F Stephen Hodi, Stephen D Zucker, Shilpa Grover

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Hepatobiliary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Current Status in Rechallenge of Immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael LiDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-811X
Jordan S SackDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Osama E RahmaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
F Stephen HodiHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen D ZuckerDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shilpa GroverDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-6843
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

ALIMENTARY TRACT RESEARCH IN HEALTH AND DISEASET32DK007533 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BLUMBERG, RICHARD S · 1986 to 2020
$5.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007533NIH HHS T32 DK00753335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the current study, the authors assessed the risks and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with resolved grade 3 to 4 ICI hepatitis because current guidelines recommend permanent ICI discontinuation in these patients.

methodsThe authors performed a retrospective cohort study from 2010 through 2019 of patients with melanoma who were treated with ≥1 ICIs and who recovered from grade 3 to 4 ICI hepatitis. The primary outcome was hepatitis recurrence and the secondary outcome was the development of any immune-related adverse event (irAE) requiring the discontinuation of ICI rechallenge. Best overall response and time to all-cause death were compared between the patients who did and those who did not undergo ICI rechallenge. Grading was performed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0).

resultsOf the 102 patients with melanoma who developed high-grade ICI hepatitis, 31 underwent ICI rechallenge. Although 15 of 31 patients (48%) developed an irAE of any grade, only 6 patients (19%) required ICI discontinuation due to irAE severity (4 of 29 patients [14%] rechallenged with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 and 2 of 2 patients [100%] rechallenged with ipilimumab). Recurrent hepatitis accounted for 4 of these 6 cases. Rechallenged patients who did not require ICI discontinuation were found to be significantly less likely to receive ipilimumab rather than anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy (0% vs 33%; relative risk (RR), 0.1 [95% CI, 0.1-0.3; P = .032]) and significantly less likely to be rechallenged with their original ICI (8% vs 50%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P = .038]). There was no difference noted with regard to best overall response or time to death between rechallenged and non-rechallenged patients.

conclusionsICI therapy can be resumed in patients with melanoma who have recovered from grade 3 to 4 ICI hepatitis with a modest risk of serious irAEs. It remains unclear whether ICI retreatment improves clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryFemaleHepatitisHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorshepatitisimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapymelanoma

Identifiers

PMID32888341
PMCPMC7655516
OpenAlexW3083702883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.