ArticlePharmaceutical research2020
Nasal Powder Formulation of Tranexamic Acid and Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Epistaxis.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intranasal drug delivery: Unlocking the nose-to-brain route for central nervous system therapies.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Protective effects of sodium hyaluronate nasal spray on murine nasal mucosa via preservation of airway surface liquid and mucociliary clearance.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- A Cell-Based Nasal Model for Screening the Deposition, Biocompatibility, and Transport of Aerosolized PLGA Nanoparticles.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Formulation, Characterization, and Optimization of a Topical Gel Containing Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Superficial Bleeding:Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Article
- Design and Application in Delivery System of Intranasal Antidepressants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to develop a nasal powder formulation of the antifibrinolytic drug, tranexamic acid (TXA), in combination with the wound-healing agent hyaluronic acid (HA) for the local treatment of epistaxis (nose bleeding).
methodsFormulations of TXA alone and with different concentrations of HA were freeze-dried and characterised according to their physicochemical properties. Aerosol performance was assessed to ensure nasal deposition with minimal lung deposition. Nasal epithelial cells were used to assess cytotoxicity, transport across the nasal epithelium, antioxidant, wound-healing and anti-inflammatory properties of all formulations.
resultsFormulations containing TXA and HA were produced and found to be mostly deposited in the nasal cavity (more than 90%). Formulation of TXA + 0.3%HA showed wound reduction of 29.3% when assessed in ALI culture. At this concentration, formulations also reduced ROS production in RPMI 2650, and IL-8 production in primary nasal epithelial cells. Furthermore, for formulations containing HA, the higher viscosity may lead to larger residence time in the nasal cavity.
conclusionsCombination of TXA with HA shows promising results for the treatment of nasal epistaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.