ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021
Visual outcomes endorse surgery of patients with spheno-orbital meningioma with minimal visual impairment or hyperostosis.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- State of the art and future perspectives on the management of spheno-orbital meningiomas: a meta-analysis comparing transorbital and transcranial approaches.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Reconstruction of orbital walls after resection of cranioorbital meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- Single-stage tumor resection and immediate CAD/CAM-assisted cranio-orbital reconstruction for spheno-orbital meningiomas: a standardized surgical workflow and outcome analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Postoperative Vision-Related Quality of Life After Sphenoid Wing Meningioma Surgery: Impact of Radiomic Shape Features and Age.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities, Adjuvant Therapies, and Recurrence Risk.Cureus · 2024Review
- Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: The Rationale behind the Decision-Making Process of Treatment Strategy.Cancers · 2024Article
- Surgical Treatment of Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Role of risk factors, scoring systems, and prognostic models in predicting the functional outcome in meningioma surgery: multicentric study of 552 skull base meningiomas.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Spheno-Orbital Meningioma and Vision Impairment-Case Report and Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Endoscopic-assisted transorbital surgery: Where do we stand on the scott's parabola? personal considerations after a 10-year experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abtract
backgroundMost spheno-orbital meningioma series span multiple decades, and predictors of visual outcomes have not yet been systemically assessed. We describe visual outcomes in a recent cohort and assess predictors of postoperative visual outcomes.
methodsConsecutive case series operated by a team of a neurosurgeon and orbital surgeon between May 2015 and January 2019. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual fields (static perimetry), and relative proptosis were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at 3/6/12 months after which it was assessed yearly. Predictors were assessed with linear regression analysis.
resultsNineteen patients (all WHO grade I) were operated by the pterional approach (median follow-up 2.4 years). Preoperative visual acuity deficits (n = 10) normalized in 70% and improved in 10% (median preoperative: 0.8, postoperative: 1.2, p = 0.021). Preoperative visual field deficits (n = 8) normalized in all patients (preoperative: - 6.5 dB, postoperative: - 1.5 dB, p = 0.008). Preoperative proptosis (n = 16) normalized in 44% and improved in 56% (preoperative: 5 mm, postoperative: 2 mm, p < 0.001). BCVA and visual fields remained stable at longer follow-up in 95% of patients, while 21% showed progression of proptosis. Predictors for worse longer-term (> 12 months) BCVA were worse preoperative BCVA (p = 0.002) and diagnosis of multiple meningioma (p = 0.021). Predictors for worse longer-term visual fields were higher diameter of hyperostosis (p = 0.009) and higher Simpson grade (p = 0.032). Predictor for short-term (3 months) proptosis was preoperative proptosis (p = 0.006).
conclusionWe recommend surgery, even of patients with minimal visual impairment or hyperostosis, as patients who present with deteriorated visual function or extensive hyperostosis are less likely to have postoperative visual outcomes restored to normal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.