Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32888071›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

A comparative study of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of breast cancer.

Nan Meng, Xuejia Wang, Jing Sun, Dongming Han, Yan Bai, Wei Wei, Zhe Wang, Fei Jia, Kaiyu Wang, Meiyun Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Parameter Estimation for the Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-diffusional Kurtosis Imaging Model Using Synthetic Q-space Learning Toward Breast Tumor Diagnosis.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nan MengDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xuejia WangDepartment of MR, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Jing SunDepartment of Pediatrics, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Dongming HanDepartment of MR, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Yan BaiDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhe WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Fei JiaDepartment of MR, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Kaiyu WangMR Research China, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Meiyun WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. mywang@ha.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-1474
Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University · CNXinxiang Medical University · CNZhengzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81720108021, 31470047the Henan Medical Science and Technology Research Program 2018020357, 2018020367the National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFE0103600Zhongyuan Thousand Talents Plan Project - Basic Research Leader Talent ZYQR201810117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions and analyze the correlations between the derived parameters and prognostic factors of breast cancer.

methodsOne hundred thirty-five women underwent breast APTWI and DKI. The magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)), apparent kurtosis coefficient (K

resultsThe K

conclusionDKI is superior to APTWI in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. Each parameter is correlated with some prognostic factors to a certain extent. KEY POINTS: • DKI and APTWI provide valuable information regarding lesion characterization. • K

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProtonsAmidesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsAmidesProtonsAPTBreast neoplasmsDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID32888071
OpenAlexW3083117305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.