Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32888020›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2021

Survival in patients with glioblastoma at a first progression does not correlate with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 gene mutation status.

Yusuke Tabei, Keiichi Kobayashi, Kuniaki Saito, Saki Shimizu, Kaori Suzuki, Nobuyoshi Sasaki, Yoshiaki Shiokawa, Motoo Nagane

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Isocitrate DehydrogenaseBritish journal of biomedical science · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Clinical and Prognostic Implications of 1p/19q,Cancer management and research · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuke TabeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Keiichi KobayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Kuniaki SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Saki ShimizuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Kaori SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Nobuyoshi SasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Yoshiaki ShiokawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Motoo NaganeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo.
Kyorin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsMutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 gene are favourable prognostic factors in newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas, whereas it remains controversial in the recurrent glioblastoma setting.

methodsA total of 171 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, either 'primary' glioblastoma or 'secondary' glioblastoma, treated at Kyorin University Hospital or Japanese Red Cross Medical Center from 2000 to 2015 were included. Patients with confirmed IDH1 status and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status were retrospectively analysed for overall survival from the initial diagnosis (n = 147) and after the first progression (n = 122).

resultsIDH1 mutation but not IDH2 was noted in 19 of 147 patients with glioblastoma (12.9%). In patients with 'primary' glioblastoma (n = 136), median overall survival after the first progression was 13.5 and 10.5 months for mutant IDH1 and wild-type IDH1 glioblastoma, respectively (P = 0.747). Multivariate analysis revealed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation, and Karnofsky Performance status 60 or higher, were independent prognostic factors for better overall survival after the first progression. When 'primary' glioblastoma and 'secondary' glioblastoma were combined, median overall survival from the first progression was not significantly different between the mutant IDH1 group (10.1 months) and wild-type IDH1 group (10.5 months) (P = 0.559), whereas median overall survival from the initial diagnosis was significantly different (47.5 months vs.18.3 months, respectively; P = 0.035).

conclusionsThese results suggest that IDH1 mutation may not be a prognostic factor for survival at the first progression of patients with 'primary' glioblastoma and pretreated 'secondary' glioblastoma, and further warrant investigation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalO(6)-Methylguanine-DNA MethyltransferaseIsocitrate DehydrogenaseO(6)-Methylguanine-DNA MethyltransferaseglioblastomaIDH statusMGMToverall survivalrecurrent glioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID32888020
PMCPMC7767982
OpenAlexW3083269518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.