Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32887886›Full record

ReviewNature communications2020

Pathways and challenges towards a complete characterization of microgels.

Frank Scheffold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Dual-Laser Optical Tweezers for Photothermal Analysis of Hybrid Microgels.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent Developments in Nanoparticle-Hydrogel Hybrid Materials for Controlled Release.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 3D Printable Poly(ACS applied polymer materials · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frank ScheffoldDepartment of Physics, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 3, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland. Frank.Scheffold@unifr.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-5811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their controlled size, sensitivity to external stimuli, and ease-of-use, microgel colloids are unique building blocks for soft materials made by crosslinking polymers on the micrometer scale. Despite the plethora of work published, many questions about their internal structure, interactions, and phase behavior are still open. The reasons for this lack of understanding are the challenges arising from the small size of the microgel particles, complex pairwise interactions, and their solvent permeability. Here we describe pathways toward a complete understanding of microgel colloids based on recent experimental advances in nanoscale characterization, such as super-resolution microscopy, scattering methods, and modeling.

Identifiers

PMID32887886
PMCPMC7473851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.