Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32887754›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2020

Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2: Let's Stick to Known Knowns.

Nicole Baumgarth, Janko Nikolich-Žugich, F Eun-Hyung Lee, Deepta Bhattacharya

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distinct Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole BaumgarthCenter for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-2891-4483
Janko Nikolich-ŽugichDepartment of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ 85724.ORCID 0000-0001-5830-5323
F Eun-Hyung LeeDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.ORCID 0000-0002-6133-5942
Deepta BhattacharyaDepartment of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ 85724; deeptab@arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-7699
University of Arizona · USEmory University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION OF ANTIBODY RESPONSES AND IMMUNITYR01AI099108 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Deepta Bhattacharya · 2012 to 2026
$6.4M
GLUCOSE AND AMINO ACID CATABOLISM IN PLASMA CELL BIOLOGYR01AI129945 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Deepta Bhattacharya · 2018 to 2026
$4.8M
T Cell Homeostasis and Function in Immune SenescenceR37AG020719 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI JANKO Z. NIKOLICH · 2018 to 2026
$4.2M
Understanding Survival of Human Bone Marrow Long-Lived Plasma CellsR01AI121252 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, FRANCES EUN-HYUNG · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Protective humoral immunity to influenza infectionR01AI117890 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BAUMGARTH, NICOLE · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
B-1 cells, IgM and Protective Humoral Immunity to InfluenzaR01AI148652 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BAUMGARTH, NICOLE · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099108NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI117890NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121252NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI129945NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148652NIA NIH HHS R37 AG020719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scale of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has thrust immunology into the public spotlight in unprecedented ways. In this article, which is part opinion piece and part review, we argue that the normal cadence by which we discuss science with our colleagues failed to properly convey likelihoods of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 to the public and the media. As a result, biologically implausible outcomes were given equal weight as the principles set by decades of viral immunology. Unsurprisingly, questionable results and alarmist news media articles have filled the void. We suggest an emphasis on setting expectations based on prior findings while avoiding the overused approach of assuming nothing. After reviewing Ab-mediated immunity after coronavirus and other acute viral infections, we posit that, with few exceptions, the development of protective humoral immunity of more than a year is the norm. Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is likely to follow the same pattern.

Indexed as

Immunity, HumoralAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBetacoronavirusB-LymphocytesClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansImmunologic MemoryMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32887754
PMCPMC7578055
OpenAlexW3082291484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.