Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32887695›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Communication about COVID-19 from Canadian provincial chief medical officers of health: a qualitative study.

Patrick Fafard, Lindsay A Wilson, Adèle Cassola, Steven J Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick FafardGlobal Strategy Lab (Fafard, Wilson, Cassola, Hoffman), York University and University of Ottawa; Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (Fafard), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research (Hoffman), Faculty of Health and Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and McMaster Health Forum (Hoffman), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Lindsay A WilsonGlobal Strategy Lab (Fafard, Wilson, Cassola, Hoffman), York University and University of Ottawa; Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (Fafard), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research (Hoffman), Faculty of Health and Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and McMaster Health Forum (Hoffman), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Adèle CassolaGlobal Strategy Lab (Fafard, Wilson, Cassola, Hoffman), York University and University of Ottawa; Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (Fafard), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research (Hoffman), Faculty of Health and Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and McMaster Health Forum (Hoffman), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Steven J HoffmanGlobal Strategy Lab (Fafard, Wilson, Cassola, Hoffman), York University and University of Ottawa; Graduate School of Public and International Affairs (Fafard), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research (Hoffman), Faculty of Health and Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and McMaster Health Forum (Hoffman), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. patrick.fafard@globalstrategylab.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, Canada's provincial chief medical officers of health (CMOHs) have provided regular updates on the pandemic response. We sought to examine whether their messaging varied over time and whether it varied across jurisdictions.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study of news releases from Canadian provincial government websites during the initial phases of the COVID-19 outbreak between Jan. 21 and Mar. 31, 2020. We performed content analysis using a predefined data extraction framework to derive themes.

resultsWe identified 290 news releases. Four broad thematic categories emerged: describing the government's preparedness and capacity building, issuing recommendations and mandates, expressing reassurance and encouraging the public, and promoting public responsibility. Most of the news releases were prescriptive, conveying recommendations and mandates to slow transmission. Cross-jurisdictional variations in messaging reflected local realities, such as evidence of community transmission. Messaging also reflected changing information about the pandemic over time, shifting from a tone of reassurance early on, to a sudden emphasis on social distancing measures, to a concern with public responsibility to slow transmission.

interpretationMessaging across jurisdictions was generally consistent, and variations in the tone and timing of CMOH messaging aligned with different and changing realities across contexts. These findings indicate that when evaluating CMOHs' statements, it is critical to consider the context of the information they possess, the epidemiologic circumstances in their jurisdiction and the way the province has structured the CMOH role.

Indexed as

CanadaCommunicationCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHumansInformation DisseminationPhysician ExecutivesQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32887695
PMCPMC7482748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.