Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32887618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Trends in adolescent first births in sub-Saharan Africa: a tale of increasing inequity?

Sarah Neal, Andrew Amos Channon, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Nyovani Madise

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Direct and Indirect Effects of Adolescent Motherhood on Under-Five Mortality in Pakistan: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Survey.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah NealDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. S.Neal@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1812-7221
Andrew Amos ChannonDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Venkatraman Chandra-MouliDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nyovani MadiseAfrican Institute for Policy Development (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
University of Southampton · GBAfrican Institute for Development Policy · MWWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle aggregate figures for adolescent pregnancy may fail to demonstrate particular population groups where rates are very high, or where progress has been slow. In addition, most indicators fail to separate younger from older adolescents. As there is some evidence that the disadvantages faced by adolescent mothers are greatest for those at the younger end of the spectrum, this is an important omission. This paper provides information on levels and trends of adolescent first births in 22 countries (at national and regional level) disaggregated by age (< 16 years, 16/17 years and 18/19 years), socio-economic status and place of residence. It highlights differences and similarities between countries in the characteristics of women who experience first birth during adolescence, as well as providing information on trends to identify groups where progress in reducing adolescent first births is poor. METHODOLOGY: In this descriptive and trend analysis study we used data from 22 low- and middle-income countries from sub-Saharan Africa that have at least three Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) since 1990, with the most recent carried out after 2005. Adolescent first births from the most recent survey are analysed by age, wealth, and residence by country and region for women aged 20-24 years at time of survey. We also calculated annual percentage rates of change (using both short- and longer-term data) for adolescent first births disaggregated by age, family wealth and residence and examined changes in concentration indices (CI).

findingsOverall percentages of adolescent first births vary considerably between countries for all disaggregated age groups. The burden of first birth among adolescents is significant, including in the youngest age group: in some countries over 20% of women gave birth before 16 years of age (e.g. Mali and Niger). Adolescent first births are more common among women who are poorer, and live in rural areas; early adolescent first births before 16 years of age are particularly concentrated in these disadvantaged groups. Progress in reducing adolescent first births has also been particularly poor amongst these vulnerable groups, leading to increasing inequity.

conclusionsFindings from this study show that adolescent births are concentrated among vulnerable groups where progress is often poorest. Strategies and programmes need to be developed to reduce adolescent pregnancies in marginalised young women in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesSocial ClassAdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaBirth OrderFemaleHumansMaliPovertyPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesVulnerable PopulationsYoung AdultAdolescent pregnancyAdolescent sexual healthEquityFertilitySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32887618
PMCPMC7487507
OpenAlexW3083235478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.