Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020
Maternal oxygen exposure may not change umbilical cord venous partial pressure of oxygen: non-random, paired venous and arterial samples from a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02221440 (Prophylactic Maternal Low Flow Nasal Oxygen Administration During the Second Stage of Labor for Fetal Distress), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prophylactic Maternal Low Flow Nasal Oxygen Administration During the Second Stage of Labor for Fetal Distress
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of intrapartum prolonged oxygen exposure on fetal metabolic status: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Trial
- Comparison of the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Cardioprotective Effects of Dexmedetomidine in an Oxidative-Stress In Vitro Model of Neonatal Rat Cardiomyocytes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intrapartum Oxygen for Fetal Resuscitation: State of the Science.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2023Review
- Quantitative TPlacenta · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the widespread use of oxygen (O
methodsThis is a planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), 443 normal women were 1:1 randomly allocated to receive 2 L/min O
resultsThere were no significant differences between the O
conclusionsMaternal O CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221440 , first posted in 20 August 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.