Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32887551›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Professional roles of general practitioners, community pharmacists and specialist providers in collaborative medication deprescribing - a qualitative study.

Navina Gerlach, Matthias Michiels-Corsten, Annika Viniol, Tanja Schleef, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Olaf Krause, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Implementation of a deprescribing guideline by community pharmacists: A focus group study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navina GerlachDepartment of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany. navina.gerlach@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-9637
Matthias Michiels-CorstenDepartment of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.
Annika ViniolDepartment of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.
Tanja SchleefHannover Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.
Ulrike Junius-WalkerHannover Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.
Olaf KrauseHannover Medical School, Institute of General Practice, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.
Norbert Donner-BanzhoffDepartment of General Practice, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DO 513/11-1, JU 2992/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollaborative care approaches between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists have received international recognition for medication optimization and deprescribing efforts. Although specialist providers have been shown to influence deprescribing, their profession so far remains omitted from collaborative care approaches for medication optimization. Similarly, while explorative studies on role perception and collaboration between GPs and pharmacists grow, interaction with specialists for medication optimization is neglected. Our qualitative study therefore aims to explore GPs', community pharmacists' and specialist providers' role perceptions of deprescribing, and to identify interpersonal as well as structural factors that may influence collaborative medication optimization approaches.

methodSeven focus-group discussions with GPs, community pharmacists and community specialists were conducted in Hesse and Lower Saxony, Germany. The topic guide focused on views and experiences with deprescribing with special attention to inter-professional collaboration. We conducted conventional content analysis and conceptualized emerging themes using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

resultsTwenty-six GPs, four community pharmacists and three community specialists took part in the study. The main themes corresponded to the four domains 'Social/professional role and identity' (1), 'Social influences' (2), 'Reinforcement' (3) and ´Environmental context and resources' (4) which were further described by beliefs statements, that is inductively developed key messages. For (1), GPs emerged as central medication managers while pharmacists and specialists were assigned confined or subordinated tasks in deprescribing. Social influences (2) encompassed patients' trust in GPs as a support, while specialists and pharmacists were believed to threaten GPs' role and deprescribing attempts. Reinforcements (3) negatively affected GPs' and pharmacists' effort in medication optimization by social reprimand and lacking reward. Environmental context (4) impeded deprescribing efforts by deficient reimbursement and resources as well as fragmentation of care, while informational and gate-keeping resources remained underutilized.

conclusionUnderstanding stakeholders' role perceptions on collaborative deprescribing is a prerequisite for joint approaches to medication management. We found that clear definition and dissemination of roles and responsibilities are premise for avoiding intergroup conflicts. Role performance and collaboration must further be supported by structural factors like adequate reimbursement, resources and a transparent continuity of care.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsGeneral PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPharmacistsProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchSpecializationDeprescriptionsGeneral practiceIntersectoral collaborationMedication therapy management, Medication optimization, Qualitative research.MultimorbidityPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID32887551
PMCPMC7487755
OpenAlexW3083669736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.