ArticleBlood advances2020
Sequential response-driven bortezomib-based therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in AL amyloidosis.
Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of Long-Term Benefit From High Dose Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in AL Amyloidosis.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Management of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Bortezomib combined with autologous stem cell transplantation overcomes cytogenetic abnormalities in AL amyloidosis.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Autologous stem cell transplantation in AL amyloidosis: Muddy waters.Blood reviews · 2024Review
- Options for Rescue Treatment of Patients with AL Amyloidosis Exposed to Upfront Daratumumab.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Diagnosis and Treatment of AL Amyloidosis.Drugs · 2023Review
- Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Induction before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with AL Amyloidosis: A Retrospective Comparison with Frontline Stem Cell Transplantation.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Light-chain cardiac amyloidosis: a case report of extraordinary sustained pathological response to cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combined therapy.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
- Changing paradigm in the treatment of amyloidosis: From disease-modifying drugs to anti-fibril therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- AL Amyloidosis: Current Chemotherapy and Immune Therapy Treatment Strategies:JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Review
- Beyond Andromeda: Improving Therapy for Light Chain Amyloidosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Clinical characterization and outcomes of a cohort of colombian patients with AL Amyloidosis.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is highly effective in selected patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Bortezomib, preceding or following ASCT, improves responses. Satisfactory responses, including at least a partial response, very good partial response (VGPR) with organ response, or complete response, can be observed after induction therapy alone. We report 139 patients treated upfront with cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (CyBorD), followed by ASCT only if response was unsatisfactory. Only 1 treatment-related death was observed. After CyBorD, hematologic response (HR) rate was 68% (VGPR or better, 51%), with 45% satisfactory responses. Transplant was performed in 55 (40%) subjects and resulted in an 80% HR rate (65% ≥ VGPR). Five-year survival was 86% and 84% in patients treated with ASCT or CyBorD alone, respectively (P = .438). Also, 6- and 12- month landmark analyses did not show differences in survival. Duration of response was not different in the 2 groups (60 vs 49 months; P = .670). Twenty-one (15%) patients with an unsatisfactory response to CyBorD could not undergo ASCT because of ineligibility or refusal; instead, they received rescue chemotherapy, with HR in 38% of cases and 51% 5-year survival. This sequential response-driven approach, offering ASCT to patients who do not attain satisfactory response to upfront CyBorD, is very safe and effective in AL amyloidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.