Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886654›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis: Port Placement and Dissection Techniques.

Tianli Du, Abdelkader Hawasli, Karen Summe, Ahmed A Meguid, Christopher Lai, Moutamn Sadoun

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BILE DUCT INJURY REPAIR IN A PATIENT WITH SITUS INVERSUS TOTALIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tianli DuDepartment of General Surgery, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Abdelkader HawasliDepartment of General Surgery, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Karen SummeDepartment of General Surgery, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Ahmed A MeguidDepartment of General Surgery, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Christopher LaiDepartment of General Surgery, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Moutamn SadounDepartment of General Surgery, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
St. John Hospital & Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Situs inversus is a rare congenital condition. Since 1991, more than 60 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been reported in patients with situs inversus. There are many different port placement techniques depending on the surgeon's preference. The fact that some of the critical dissection is easier performed by the left hand poses technical difficulty for right-handed surgeons. CASE REPORT A 56-year-old woman with known situs inversus totalis and extensive past surgical history presented with acute cholecystitis. A Veress needle was used to enter the abdomen at Palmer's point. Visiport was used to place the first 5-mm port at the left mid-clavicular line. The dissection was performed in a mirror image to the usual dissection through the epigastric port. CONCLUSIONS There have been several techniques described in the literature to facilitate the dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with situs inversus totalis. We argue that the first port should be placed at the mid-clavicular line with Visiport. The other ports should be placed in mirror image of the normally placed ports, including a 12-mm epigastric port, 5-mm or 11-mm paraumbilical port, and 5-mm port at the left anterior axillary line. For dissection, we argue that it is preferable to have 2 assistants with 1 retracting the gallbladder and the other holding the camera. This allows the primary surgeon to use the dominant hand during critical dissection in this unfamiliar anatomy.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicDextrocardiaSitus InversusDissectionFemaleGallbladderHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32886654
PMCPMC7491955
OpenAlexW3083221659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.