ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020
Multimodality imaging review of complex pelvic lesions in female pelvis.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting with rare urogenital involvement: a case based review.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- A Rare Presentation of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Pure Stromal Hyperplasia as a Large Isolated Pelvic Mass With Normal Prostate Imaging.International journal of surgical pathology · 2026Article
- ESUR female pelvis group approach to cystic female pelvic lesions.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Benign serous cystadenofibroma with multimodal imaging suggestive of malignancy in a symptomatic postmenopausal patient.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2025Article
- Round ligament fibroid: A case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Incidental findings in female pelvis MRI performed for gynaecological malignancies.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Role of Transvaginal Sonography in the Diagnosis of Female Infertility: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Primary extracranial meningioma of the pelvis discovered on screening pelvic examination.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex pelvic lesions can originate from various anatomical structures in the pelvis and pose a diagnostic dilemma due to a wide range of possible diagnoses. Accurate characterisation of these lesions would often require an algorithmic approach, which incorporates clinical findings, sequential use of multiple imaging modalities and a multiparametric approach. This approach usually aims at identifying key imaging features, which aid in anatomical localisation, morphology and tissue characterisation. There have been various attempts to standardise the lexicon used for describing adnexal masses in female patients; stratify their risk of cancer and suggest appropriate next steps in the management pathway. Through this review, we extend this approach to complex pelvic masses in female pelvis in general and will focus on optimal use of different imaging modalities to arrive at definitive diagnosis or meaningful differential diagnosis. We will also discuss potential pitfalls of imaging diagnosis and common mimics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.