Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886396›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of industrial medicine2020

Cooling intervention studies among outdoor occupational groups: A review of the literature.

Roxana Chicas, Nezahualcoyotl Xiuhtecutli, Nathan E Dickman, Madeleine L Scammell, Kyle Steenland, Vicki S Hertzberg, Linda McCauley

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of industrial medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities on the Health Effects of Heatwaves: A Systematic Review of Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roxana ChicasNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-1618
Nezahualcoyotl XiuhtecutliDepartment of Anthropology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Nathan E DickmanUniversity of the Ozarks, Clarksville, Arkansas, USA.
Madeleine L ScammellDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kyle SteenlandDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Vicki S HertzbergNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Linda McCauleyNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory University · USBoston University · USTulane University · USUniversity of the Ozarks · US

Funding

Nephrology Institutional Training Grant FLSA SupplementT32DK007656 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SANDS, JEFF M, WALL, SUSAN MARIE · 1990 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007656NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008438NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008673Sunshine Education and Research Center at University of South Florida 5T42OH008438-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this systematic review is to examine cooling intervention research in outdoor occupations, evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions, and offer recommendations for future studies. This review focuses on outdoor occupational studies conducted at worksites or simulated occupational tasks in climatic chambers.

methodsThis systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify original research on intervention studies published in peer-reviewed journals that aimed at reducing heat stress or heat-related illness from January 2000 to August 2020.

resultsA systematic search yielded a total of 1042 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. Occupations with cooling intervention studies included agriculture (n = 5), construction (n = 5), industrial workers (n = 4), and firefighters (n = 7). The studies focused on multiple types of cooling interventions cooling gear (vest, bandanas, cooling shirts, or head-cooling gel pack), enhanced heat dissipation clothing, forearm or lower body immersion in cold water, water dousing, ingestion of a crushed ice slush drink, electrolyte liquid hydration, and modified Occupational Safety and Health Administration recommendations of drinking water and resting in the shade.

conclusionCurrent evidence indicates that using multiple cooling gears along with rest cycles may be the most effective method to reduce heat-related illness. Occupational heat-related illnesses and death may be mitigated by targeted cooling intervention and workplace controls among workers of vulnerable occupational groups and industries.

Indexed as

Heat Stress DisordersHot TemperatureHumansOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthOccupationsProtective ClothingWorkplacecooling interventionsheat-related illnessoccupational health

Identifiers

PMID32886396
PMCPMC7745167
OpenAlexW3083254770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.