Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886298›Full record

Observational studyCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2021

A prospective, observational, cohort study of airway management of patients with COVID-19 by specialist tracheal intubation teams.

Imran Ahmad, Jeyanjali Jeyarajah, Ganeshkrishna Nair, Sophie C Ragbourne, Benjamin Vowles, Danny J N Wong, Kariem El-Boghdadly

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-impact papers in the field of anesthesiology: a 10-year cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Ethics of Procedural Education Under Pandemic Conditions.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Considerations for acute care staffing during a pandemic.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Imran AhmadDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK. drimranahmad1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3675-7040
Jeyanjali JeyarajahDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Ganeshkrishna NairDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Sophie C RagbourneDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Benjamin VowlesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Danny J N WongDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Kariem El-BoghdadlyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas', NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBecause of the anticipated surge in cases requiring intensive care unit admission, the high aerosol-generating risk of tracheal intubation, and the specific requirements in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients, a dedicated Mobile Endotracheal Rapid Intubation Team (MERIT) was formed to ensure that a highly skilled team would be deployed to manage the airways of this cohort of patients. Here, we report our intubation team experience and activity as well as patient outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe MERIT members followed a protocolized early tracheal intubation model. Over a seven-week period during the peak of the pandemic, prospective data were collected on MERIT activity, COVID-19 symptoms or diagnosis in the team members, and demographic, procedural, and clinical outcomes of patients.

resultsWe analyzed data from 150 primary tracheal intubation episodes, with 101 (67.3%) of those occurring in men, and with a mean (standard deviation) age of 55.7 (13.8) yr. Black, Asian, and minority ethnic groups accounted for 55.7% of patients. 91.3% of tracheal intubations were performed with videolaryngoscopy, and the first pass success rate was 88.0%. The 30-day survival was 69.2%, and the median [interquartile range] length of critical care stay was 11 [6-20] days and of hospital stay was 12 [7-22] days. Seven (11.1%) MERIT healthcare professionals self-isolated because of COVID-19 symptoms, with a total 41 days of clinical work lost. There was one reported incident of a breach of personal protective equipment and multiple anecdotal reports of doffing breaches.

conclusionWe have shown that a highly skilled designated intubation team, following a protocolized, early tracheal intubation model may be beneficial in improving patient and staff safety, and could be considered by other institutions in future pandemic surges.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealAdultAgedCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposurePandemicsProspective StudiesCOVID-19intubationtracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID32886298
PMCPMC7472940
OpenAlexW3083222967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.