Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886252›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2021

Manifold learning for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional loss assessment : Development and validation of a prognosis model.

Vincent Grollemund, Gaétan Le Chat, Marie-Sonia Secchi-Buhour, François Delbot, Jean-François Pradat-Peyre, Peter Bede, Pierre-François Pradat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. New developments in imaging in ALS.Journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vincent GrollemundLIP6, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. vincent.grollemund@lip6.fr.
Gaétan Le ChatFRS Consulting, Paris, France.
Marie-Sonia Secchi-BuhourFRS Consulting, Paris, France.
François DelbotLIP6, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Jean-François Pradat-PeyreLIP6, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Peter BedeLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Pierre-François PradatLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

Health Research Board (Ireland) EIA-2017-2019MESRI grant CIFRE 2017/1051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an inexorably progressive neurodegenerative condition with no effective disease-modifying therapy at present. Given the striking clinical heterogeneity of the condition, the development and validation of reliable prognostic models is a recognised research priority. We present a prognostic model for functional decline in ALS where outcome uncertainty is taken into account. Patient data were reduced and projected onto a 2D space using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), a novel non-linear dimension reduction technique. Information from 3756 patients was included. Development data were sourced from past clinical trials. Real-world population data were used as validation data. Predictors included age, gender, region of onset, symptom duration, weight at baseline, functional impairment, and estimated rate of functional loss. UMAP projection of patients showed an informative 2D data distribution. As limited data availability precluded complex model designs, the projection was divided into three zones defined by a functional impairment range probability. Zone membership allowed individual patient prediction. Patients belonging to the first zone had a probability of [Formula: see text] (± [Formula: see text]) to have an ALSFRS score over 20 at 1-year follow-up. Patients within the second zone had a probability of [Formula: see text] (± [Formula: see text]) to have an ALSFRS score between 10 and 30 at 1 year follow-up. Finally, patients within the third zone had a probability of [Formula: see text] (± [Formula: see text]) to have an ALSFRS score lower than 20 at 1 year follow-up. This approach requires a limited set of features, is easily updated, improves with additional patient data, and accounts for results uncertainty. This method could therefore be used in a clinical setting for patient stratification and outcome projection.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisALSManifold learningNon-linear dimension reductionPrognosisUMAP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.