Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886157›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2021

Clinical Pharmacology of Botulinum Toxin Drugs.

Dirk Dressler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06788158 (Clinical Effects of the Intralesional Application of Incobotulinum Toxin vs Corticosteroid in Patients With Plantar Fascitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06788158 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Effects of the Intralesional Application of Incobotulinum Toxin vs Corticosteroid in Patients With Plantar Fascitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPlantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Pain, FunctionArmsIncobotulinum Toxin A, Glucocorticoid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in Clostridial and Related Neurotoxins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Botulinum toxin therapy: past, present and future developments.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dirk DresslerMovement Disorders Section, Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. dressler.dirk@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum toxin (BT) has changed from a deadly poison to a novel therapeutic principle for a large number of disorders in many medical areas.BT drugs are special in many ways: they are biologicals, their active ingredient BT is not patentable, their spectrum of clinical applications is extremely broad, their dose range is enormous, their mode of action is local and their life cycles are special.This review covers BT's therapeutic mode of action, time course of action, target tissues, pharmacological profile, adverse effects, interactions, potency labelling and antigenicity as well as BT's therapeutic preparations.

Indexed as

Botulinum ToxinsPharmaceutical PreparationsHumansBotulinum ToxinsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdverse effectsAntigenicityBotulinum toxinClinical pharmacologyInteractionsMode of actionPharmacological profilePotency labellingTarget tissuesTherapeutic preparationsTime course

Identifiers

PMID32886157
OpenAlexW3083451023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.