Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886134›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2021

[Bone transplantation or biomaterials? : An analysis of 99,863 surgical procedures in orthopedic and trauma surgery in Germany from 2018].

Markus Rupp, Maximilian Kerschbaum, Lisa Klute, Leona Frank, Volker Alt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2021
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus RuppKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Maximilian KerschbaumKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Lisa KluteKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Leona FrankKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Volker AltKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland. volker.alt@ukr.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study were (1) to analyze the total number of interventions with autologous or allogeneic bone transplantation as well as biomaterials, (2) to investigate the different types of biomaterials, autologous and allogeneic bone transplantations and (3) to analyze the additional use of an antibiotic additive in biomaterials.

methodsData were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office for the year 2018. The surgery and procedure codes 5‑784 "bone transplantation and transposition" and 5‑785 "implantation of alloplastic bone substitutes" were used to analyze the procedure frequency of implantation of biomaterials, such as calcium phosphate ceramics, calcium sulphate, calcium phosphate cements and polymethyl methacrylate as well as autologous and allogeneic bone for defect reconstruction of the extremities and pelvis.

resultsIn 2018 a total of 99,863 procedures were performed using autografts (54,784, 55%), biomaterials (23,838, 24%) and allografts (21,241, 21%). For both autografts and allografts cancellous bone grafting was used most frequently (77% and 79%, respectively). For biomaterials, ceramics (42%) were used more frequently than bone cements (37%, other biomaterials 21%). In 16,027 cases (67%) with biomaterials no antibiotic supplement was used. Antibiotic supplementation was mainly used for bone cements (6612 cases, 75%).

conclusionIn 2018 bone transplants or biomaterials were used in a considerable number of the 99,863 bone defect reconstruction procedures. Autologous bone was used in more than half of the cases (55%), biomaterials in approximately one quarter (24%) and allogenic bone in approximately one fifth (21%). Ceramics (42%) were more often used as biomaterials than cements (37%). The addition of antibiotics was mainly used with cements (75%).

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesBone CementsBone TransplantationGermanyHumansTransplantation, AutologousBiocompatible MaterialsBone CementsBone SubstitutesAllograftAutograftBone cementBone graft substituteCeramic bone void fillers

Identifiers

PMID32886134
PMCPMC8263544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.