Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32886057›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Effectiveness of mobile produce markets in increasing access and affordability of fruits and vegetables among low-income seniors.

Reece Lyerly, Pasquale Rummo, Sarah Amin, Whitney Evans, Eliza Dexter Cohen, Eliza Lawson, Eliza Hallett, Sophia De-Oliveira, Jennifer Rose, Cassandra Sutten Coats and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Food is Medicine Initiative for Mitigating Food Insecurity in the United States.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Reece LyerlyRhode Island Public Health Institute, 383 W. Fountain St. Suite 101, Providence, RI02903, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0420-5113
Pasquale RummoDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah AminUniversity of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Whitney EvansThe Miriam Hospital/Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
Eliza Dexter CohenRhode Island Public Health Institute, 383 W. Fountain St. Suite 101, Providence, RI02903, USA.
Eliza LawsonRhode Island Public Health Institute, 383 W. Fountain St. Suite 101, Providence, RI02903, USA.
Eliza HallettDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Sophia De-OliveiraRhode Island Public Health Institute, 383 W. Fountain St. Suite 101, Providence, RI02903, USA.
Jennifer RoseWesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA.
Cassandra Sutten CoatsRhode Island Public Health Institute, 383 W. Fountain St. Suite 101, Providence, RI02903, USA.
Amy NunnRhode Island Public Health Institute, 383 W. Fountain St. Suite 101, Providence, RI02903, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMobile produce markets (MPM) offering Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) incentive programmes have the potential to provide accessible and affordable fruits and vegetables (FV) to populations at risk of food insecurity. The objective of this study is to characterise the customer base of an MPM and describe their participation at twelve market sites serving low-income seniors.

designIn 2018, customers from an MPM in Rhode Island (RI) participated in a cross-sectional survey (n 330; 68 % response rate), which measured dietary patterns, food security and food shopping behaviours. We compared the shopping habits and market experiences of customers who currently received SNAP benefits with those who did not currently receive SNAP benefits.

settingAn MPM in RI which offers a 50 % discount for FV purchased with SNAP benefits.

participantsThis study describes current market customers at twelve market sites serving low-income seniors.

resultsMarket customers were mostly low-income, female, over the age of 50 years and Hispanic/Latino. Most customers received SNAP benefits, and almost half were food insecure. In addition, three quarters of SNAP customers reported their SNAP benefits last longer since shopping at the markets. Mixed logistic regression models indicated that SNAP customers were more likely to report buying and eating more FV than non-SNAP customers.

conclusionsMPM are critical resources of affordable produce and have been successful in improving access to FV among individuals of low socio-economic status in RI. This case study can inform policy and programme recommendations for MPM and SNAP incentive programmes.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFruitVegetablesCosts and Cost AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood SupplyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRhode IslandFood securityHealthy eatingMobile produce marketNutrition incentiveOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID32886057
PMCPMC10200560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.