Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885815›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2020

Adapting to disruption of research during the COVID-19 pandemic while testing nonpharmacological approaches to pain management.

Brian C Coleman, Jacob Kean, Cynthia A Brandt, Peter Peduzzi, Robert D Kerns

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian C ColemanPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Jacob KeanPain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cynthia A BrandtPain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Peter PeduzziPain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Robert D KernsPain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USUniversity of Utah · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center (PMC3)U24AT009769 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM C BECKER, Alicia Heapy · 2017 to 2026
$16.4M
HSRD VA IU1 HX002607NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has slowed research progress, with particularly disruptive effects on investigations of addressing urgent public health challenges, such as chronic pain. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Department of Defense (DoD) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pain Management Collaboratory (PMC) supports 11 large-scale, multisite, embedded pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) in military and veteran health systems. The PMC rapidly developed and enacted a plan to address key issues in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The PMC tracked and collaborated in developing plans for addressing COVID-19 impacts across multiple domains and characterized the impact of COVID-19 on PCT operations, including delays in recruitment and revisions of study protocols. A harmonized participant questionnaire will facilitate later meta-analyses and cross-study comparisons of the impact of COVID-19 across all 11 PCTs. The pandemic has affected intervention delivery, outcomes, regulatory and ethics issues, participant recruitment, and study design. The PMC took concrete steps to ensure scientific rigor while encouraging flexibility in the PCTs, while paying close attention to minimizing the burden on research participants, investigators, and clinical care teams. Sudden changes in the delivery of pain management interventions will probably alter treatment effects measured via PMC PCTs. Through the use of harmonized instruments and surveys, we are capturing these changes and plan to monitor the impact on research practices, as well as on health outcomes. Analyses of patient-reported measures over time will inform potential relationships between chronic pain, mental health, and various socioeconomic stressors common among Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPain ManagementPandemicsPneumonia, ViralResearchBetacoronavirusChronic PainCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19HumansMental HealthNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Patient SelectionSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesCOVID-19Disruption of researchInterventionsPain managementPragmatic clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID32885815
PMCPMC7499692
OpenAlexW3081580988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.