ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Prevalence of Abnormal Heart Weight After Sudden Death in People Younger than 40 Years of Age.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac deaths with structural heart abnormalities in the young (0-49 years): a ten-year forensic autopsy review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Post-mortem cardiomegaly descriptor: Call for consistent criteria.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Current causes of sudden death in large populations: differences between resuscitated patients and autopsied cases.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Morphological phenotype of right ventricular outflow tract is associated with cardiovascular outcomes and premature death.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor regarding the article "Heart weight must not be measured before dissection during autopsies".International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- A convolutional attention mapping deep neural network for classification and localization of cardiomegaly on chest X-rays.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Preventive role of cinnamaldehyde against tenuazonic acid- and Freund's adjuvant-induced histopathological and biochemical alterations in the mouse model.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmias associated with biallelic variants in C1QBP.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Abnormal Heart Weight After Sudden Death in People Younger than 40 Years of Age.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background After sudden cardiac death in people aged <40 years, heart weight is a surrogate for cardiomegaly and a marker for cardiomyopathy. However, thresholds for cardiomegaly based on heart weight have not been validated in a cohort of cases of sudden cardiac death in young people. Methods and Results We surveyed medical examiner offices to determine which tools were used to assess heart weight norms. The survey determined that there was no gold standard for cardiomegaly (52 centers reported 22 different methods). We used a collection of heart weight data from sudden deaths in the Northwestern Sudden Death Collaboration (NSDC) to test the 22 methods. We found that the methods reported in our survey had little consistency: they classified between 18% and 81% of NSDC hearts with cardiomegaly. Therefore, we obtained biometric and postmortem data from a reference population of 3398 decedents aged <40 years. The reference population was ethnically diverse and had no known cardiac pathology on autopsy or histology. We derived and validated a multivariable regression model to predict normal heart weights and a threshold for cardiomegaly (upper 95% CI limit) in the young reference population (the Chicago model). Using the new model, the prevalence of cardiomegaly in hearts from the NSDC was 19%. Conclusions Medical examiner offices use a variety of tools to classify cardiomegaly. These approaches produce inconsistent results, and many overinterpret cardiomegaly. We recommend the model proposed to classify postmortem cardiomegaly in cases of sudden cardiac death in young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.