Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885702›Full record

ReviewExpert review of cardiovascular therapy2020

Current challenges in cardiac rehabilitation: strategies to overcome social factors and attendance barriers.

Shahzad Chindhy, Pam R Taub, Carl J Lavie, Jia Shen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shahzad ChindhyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego , CA, USA.
Pam R TaubDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego , CA, USA.
Carl J LavieJohn Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School, -the University of Queensland School of Medicine , New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jia ShenDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego , CA, USA.

Funding

HL-132: Increasing Adherence to Guideline-Based Exercise Therapy For Chronic Heart FailureR01HL136407 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MILLS, PAUL J · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly reduces secondary cardiovascular events and mortality and is a class 1A recommendation by the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC). However, it remains an underutilized intervention and many eligible patients fail to enroll or complete CR programs. The aim of this review is to identify barriers to CR attendance and discuss strategies to overcome them. AREAS COVERED: Specific barriers to CR attendance and participation will be reviewed. This will be followed by a discussion of solutions/strategies to help overcome these barriers with a particular focus on home-based CR (HBCR). EXPERT OPINION: HBCR alone or in combination with center-based CR (CBCR) can help overcome many barriers to traditional CBCR participation, such as schedule flexibility, time commitment, travel distance, cost, and patient preference. Using remote coaching with indirect exercise supervision, HBCR has been shown to have comparable benefits to CBCR. At this time, however, funding remains the main barrier to universal incorporation of HBCR into health systems, necessitating the need for additional cost benefit analysis and outcome studies. Ultimately, the choice for HBCR should be based on patient preference and availability of resources.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationSocial FactorsAmerican Heart AssociationCardiologyHumansUnited StatesBarrierscardiac rehabilitationhome-based cardiac rehabilitationstrategiestele-rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32885702
PMCPMC7749053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.