Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885535›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2020

Interbacterial competition and anti-predatory behaviour of environmental Vibrio cholerae strains.

Natália C Drebes Dörr, Melanie Blokesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Defence systems encoded by core genomic islands of seventh pandemicPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Multiplicity of type 6 secretion system toxins limits the evolution of resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sporadic type VI secretion in seventh pandemicMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Microbial genomics · 2023
    Article
  17. Pesticin-Like Effector VgrG3Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  18. PandemicLife science alliance · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natália C Drebes DörrLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Global Health Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4088-8548
Melanie BlokeschLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Global Health Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7024-1489

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 724630Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55008726Novartis Foundation for medical-biological research 18C178Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_185022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae isolates responsible for cholera pandemics represent only a small portion of the diverse strains belonging to this species. Indeed, most V. cholerae are encountered in aquatic environments. To better understand the emergence of pandemic lineages, it is crucial to discern what differentiates pandemic strains from their environmental relatives. Here, we studied the interaction of environmental V. cholerae with eukaryotic predators or competing bacteria and tested the contributions of the haemolysin and the type VI secretion system (T6SS) to those interactions. Both of these molecular weapons are constitutively active in environmental isolates but subject to tight regulation in the pandemic clade. We showed that several environmental isolates resist amoebal grazing and that this anti-grazing defense relies on the strains' T6SS and its actincross-linking domain (ACD)-containing tip protein. Strains lacking the ACD were unable to defend themselves against grazing amoebae but maintained high levels of T6SS-dependent interbacterial killing. We explored the latter phenotype through whole-genome sequencing of 14 isolates, which unveiled a wide array of novel T6SS effector and (orphan) immunity proteins. By combining these in silico predictions with experimental validations, we showed that highly similar but non-identical immunity proteins were insufficient to provide cross-immunity among those wild strains.

Indexed as

AmoebaBacterial ProteinsCholeraGenome, BacterialHemolysin ProteinsHumansPandemicsType VI Secretion SystemsVibrio choleraeBacterial ProteinsHemolysin ProteinshlyA protein, Vibrio choleraeType VI Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID32885535
PMCPMC7702109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.