Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2020
High-dose dexamethasone as a replacement for traditional prednisone as the first-line treatment in children with previously untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective, randomized single-center study.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline on the emergency management of critical bleeding in patients with immune thrombocytopenia.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Impact of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists on Pathophysiology of Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Contextualization from a Historical Perspective.Hematology reports · 2024Review
- High-dose dexamethasone as the first-line treatment in children with primary immune thrombocytopenia?International journal of hematology · 2021Article
- Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Novel Insights into Pathophysiology and Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is one of the most common acquired immune-mediated bleeding disorders found in children. Prednisone is usually considered a first-line therapeutic agent for ITP in children. Yet, prolonged exposure to prednisone has been associated with certain side effects. This prospective randomized study comparatively assessed the efficacy and safety of short-course high-dose dexamethasone (HDD) and standard prednisone (PDN) as a first-line treatment for children with previously untreated primary ITP. Two hundred eleven children were randomized into the HDD (n = 110) and PDN (n = 101) groups. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). Early response rates were 92.7% and 93% (p = 0.923); initial response rates were 93.6% and 95% (p = 0.658) and durable response rates were 90% and 91% (p = 0.787) in the HDD and PDN groups, respectively. More remission patients in the HDD group compared with the PDN group (86.3% vs. 80.1%) at 12th month after treatment, yet no statistical difference was observed (p = 0.703). Bleeding events were 10.9% and 14.8% (p = 0.105), and bleeding score improvement rates were 78.2% and 76.2% (p = 0.284) in the HDD and PDN groups, respectively. Cushing's disease, weight gain and infection rates were higher in the PDN group compared to the HDD group (80% vs. 10%, p = 0.001; 74.2% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.001; and 26% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.012) 1 month after treatment. HDD showed non-inferior efficacy and fewer glucocorticoid-related adverse effects compared with PDN. These findings indicated that HDD could be considered as a first-line treatment in children with previously untreated primary ITP, thus replacing standard PDN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.