ArticleHNO2021
[Evaluation of standardized questionnaires for diagnosis and differentiation of obstructive and patulous Eustachian tube dysfunction].
Article in HNO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Usefulness of ETDQ-7 Score in Assessing ETD.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025Trial
- [Hyperbaric oxygen therapy : Selected indications in the discipline of otorhinolaryngology].HNO · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatulous Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction can impair quality of life (QOL) due to autophony, pressure sensation, and an altered impression of sound. In cases of nonspecific complaints the diagnosis of patulous ET can be difficult, and its distinction from chronic obstructive ET dysfunction is particularly challenging. Since there is currently a lack of standardized diagnostic and therapeutic options, a structured diagnostic workup is essential for accurate diagnosis of this condition. The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Patient Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) was established by McCoul et al. in 2012 for investigating chronic obstructive ET dysfunction. The Patulous Eustachian Tube Handicap Inventory-10 (PHI-10) was published by Kobayashi et al. in 2017 as an instrument to evaluate patulous ET. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe PHI-10 questionnaire was translated into German and validated in a total of 83 patients (41 healthy subjects, 13 patients with tinnitus, 11 patients with patulous ET, and 18 patients with chronic obstructive ET dysfunction). In addition, the PHI-10 (German) was compared to ETDQ‑7.
resultsThe results of the English version of the PHI-10 questionnaire could be confirmed using the German version. The German version of the PHI-10 and the results of the PHI-10 and ETDQ‑7 for each group of patients are presented. The ETDQ‑7 leads to false-positive results in patients with patulous ET and the PHI-10 generates false-positive results in patients with chronic obstructive ET dysfunction. Both questionnaires result in false-positive results in patients with tinnitus.
conclusionThe PHI-10 and ETDQ‑7 (German) can be recommended as an additional tool for preoperative assessment of ET dysfunction. However, they insufficiently discriminate between patulous and obstructive ET dysfunction and are not suitable for patients with tinnitus. The strength of the two questionnaires lies in their suitability for use in monitoring therapeutic success during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.