Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885300›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Changes in appearance of cortical formation abnormalities in the foetus detected on sequential in utero MR imaging.

Paul D Griffiths, Mariasavina Severino, Deborah Jarvis, Laura Mandefield, Cecilia Parazzini, Lorenzo Pinelli, Marco Di Maurizio, Fabio Triulzi, Elisa Scola, Giorgio Conte and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Paul D GriffithsAcademic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mariasavina SeverinoNeuroradiology Department, IRCCS-Gaslini Children's Research Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Deborah JarvisAcademic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Laura MandefieldClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Cecilia ParazziniPediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology Department, Children's Hospital V. Buzzi, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo PinelliNeuroradiology Department, Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Marco Di MaurizioRadiology Department, Children's Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Fabio TriulziNeuroradiology Department, IRCCS-Fondazione Policlinco di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Elisa ScolaNeuroradiology Department, IRCCS-Fondazione Policlinco di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio ConteNeuroradiology Department, IRCCS-Fondazione Policlinco di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni PalumboNeuroradiology Department, Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. gio17.palumbo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-7461
Maurilio GenovesePediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology Department, Children's Hospital V. Buzzi, Milan, Italy.
Andrea RossiNeuroradiology Department, IRCCS-Gaslini Children's Research Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Renzo GuerriniNeuroscience Department, Children's Hospital Meyer, Florence, Italy.
Andrea RighiniPediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology Department, Children's Hospital V. Buzzi, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme NIHR HTA (09/06/01)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe describe 64 foetuses with cortical formation abnormalities (CFA) who had two in utero magnetic resonance (iuMR) exams, paying particular detail to those in which the original classification of CFA category changed between the two studies. The goal was to attempt to quantify the value of third-trimester follow-up studies in CFA foetuses on second-trimester iuMR imaging.

methodsThe 64 foetuses reviewed came from a CFA cohort of 374 foetuses reported in an earlier publication, which detailed a classification for foetal CFA. A consensus panel of senior paediatric neuroradiologists reviewed both studies, described any change in the category of CFA between them, and attempted to predict the possible clinical significance of any differences based on the combined clinical experience of the panel.

resultsIn 40/64 (62%) foetuses, the CFA description was the same on both studies. In 24/64 (38%) cases, there was a category change which included three foetuses without CFA on first examination, six foetuses where the difference involved change in laterality/symmetry, and in 15 cases the re-classification involved categorical change within the same group. Brain abnormalities other than CFA were present in 30/64 (47%) foetuses on the first study and in 33/64 (52%) on the second. We predicted that prognosis would have changed on the basis of the second study in 8% of cases, all indicating worse prognosis.

conclusionsWe have shown that the extra diagnostic and predicted prognostic yield justifies follow-up studies in the third trimester if a CFA is shown on the second-trimester iuMR imaging. KEY POINTS: • Sixty-four foetuses with cortical formation abnormalities had two iuMR studies, for the vast majority the baseline in the second trimester and the sequential in the third. • In three foetuses, the cortical formation abnormality (CFA) was not visible on the first study. In a further 21 foetuses, the categorical description of the CFA changed between the two studies. Prognosis changed in 8% of the cases following the second iuMR study, and in all cases, the prognosis was worse. • Multiple iuMR studies provide information about the natural history of CFA; the extra diagnostic and predicted prognostic yield justifies follow-up studies.

Indexed as

Nervous System MalformationsPrenatal DiagnosisBrainChildFemaleFetusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyBrainFoetusMagnetic resonance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.