Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885274›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2020

An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure.

Swan Lin, Naveed Shaik, Geoffrey Chan, Jorge E Cortes, Ana Ruiz-Garcia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01546038 (A PHASE 1B/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-04449913, AN ORAL HEDGEHOG INHIBITOR, IN COMBINATION WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, LOW DOSE ARA-C OR DECITABINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA OR HIGH-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01546038 phase2completednot on this map

A phase 1b/2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pf-04449913, an oral hedgehog inhibitor, in combination with intensive chemotherapy, low dose ara-c or decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2012 to 2019Enrolled255ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsPF-04449913, Low dose ARA-C (LDAC), Decitabine, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Swan LinClinical Pharmacology, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc, 10555 Science Center Dr, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA. swan.lin@pfizer.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7705-9401
Naveed ShaikClinical Pharmacology, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc, 10555 Science Center Dr, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
Geoffrey ChanPfizer Oncology, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Jorge E CortesGeorgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
Ana Ruiz-GarciaClinical Pharmacology, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc, 10555 Science Center Dr, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USNational Cancer Center of Georgia · GE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlasdegib, an oral inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, is approved in the United States in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) to treat patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. This population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis characterized the time course of survival with glasdegib + LDAC relative to LDAC alone, and explored whether the differences in glasdegib exposure at the clinical dose of 100 mg once daily (QD) significantly affected overall survival (OS).

methodsData from the BRIGHT AML 1003 trial in patients with AML were included in treatment-response (glasdegib + LDAC, n = 78; LDAC alone, n = 38) and exposure-response (glasdegib + LDAC, n = 75) analyses.

resultsThe analyses demonstrate that patients treated with glasdegib + LDAC (vs LDAC alone) at any time point during the study period were 58% less likely to die, translating to prolonging of median OS by ~ 5 months (hazard ratio 0.42 [95% confidence interval 0.28-0.66]). Variability in glasdegib exposures did not impact the risk of death. Additionally, potential covariates such as patient demographics, prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent, baseline safety laboratory values, and disease characteristics, did not impact the probability of OS.

conclusionTogether these results confirm that glasdegib + LDAC treatment (vs. LDAC alone) is associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed AML, and that variability in glasdegib doses (e.g., for dose reductions) and exposures do not compromise the survival benefit of glasdegib 100 mg QD. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01546038.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsArea Under CurveBenzimidazolesCytarabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleHedgehog ProteinsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedPhenylurea CompoundsBenzimidazolesCytarabineglasdegibHedgehog ProteinsPhenylurea CompoundsAcute myeloid leukemiaExposure–responseHedgehogOverall survivalSmoothened inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID32885274
PMCPMC7515941
OpenAlexW3083147670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.