ArticleSouthern medical journal2020
Prediction of Functional Limitations in Balance after Tests of Tandem Walking and Standing Balance in Older Adults.
Article in Southern medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOlder adults who may not complain of balance problems may nevertheless be developing subtle balance problems that may affect future functioning. This study sought to determine whether subtle problems could be predicted by standard balance testing.
methodsAt the geriatric medicine clinic at an academic tertiary-care center, geriatricians referred 27 people who were ambulatory without gait aids and had no apparent neurologic or musculoskeletal impairments affecting their balance or gait performance. Initially, subjects were screened with some questions about vertigo, tests of standing balance on foam with eyes closed (Romberg tests) with head still, and head nodding (pitch) and shaking (yaw) at 0.3 Hz, and tandem walking with eyes closed (TW). Approximately 2 years later, 22 subjects were available to be rescreened.
resultsAt the second test date subjects' scores declined slightly but significantly on all three variations of the Romberg tests: with head still, head pitch, and head yaw,
conclusionsThe data suggest that some older adults may have subtle musculoskeletal impairments that may be indicated by simple balance tests. A finding on these tests may indicate the need for further workup for balance-related problems. These quick, inexpensive tests can be administered by ancillary staff and may add important information to the initial visit and annual follow-up visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.