ArticleImplementation science communications2020
Ready, set, go!: exploring use of a readiness process to implement pharmacy services.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of organizational readiness for integrating primary eye care into primary healthcare: a mixed-method pre-implementation study in rural Xinjiang.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Community pharmacists as behavioral health extenders: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type II feasibility evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Screening and referral programs for diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Can community pharmacists bridge the care gap?Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Organizational readiness and implementation of colorectal cancer screening evidence-based interventions in federally qualified health centers: A cross-sectional study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Community Pharmacy Recruitment for Practice-Based Research: Challenges and Lessons Learned.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using cognitive interviews to improve a measure of organizational readiness for implementation.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Implementing the Strengths Model of Case Management: Assessing Practice Three Years After Initial Implementation.Community mental health journal · 2022Review
- Readiness as a precursor of early implementation outcomes: an exploratory study in specialty clinics.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Using Implementation Mapping to Build Organizational Readiness.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- School Coordinators' Perceptions of Organizational Readiness Is Associated with Implementation Fidelity in a Smoking Prevention Program: Findings from the X:IT II Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021Article
- Readiness of community pharmacies to implement an opioid safety intervention.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReadiness is an essential precursor of successful implementation; however, its conceptualization and application has proved elusive. R = MC
methodsThis mixed methods exploratory study used data collected as part of a process evaluation. Understanding application of the readiness process (Aim 1) involved examining team members' involvement (who?), readiness challenges and readiness building strategies (what?), strategy execution (how much?), and resulting changes (for what purpose?). To understand the sites' experience with the R = MC
resultsSites included primary care and specialty clinics, pharmacies within health systems, and community pharmacies. Teams consisted of 4-11 members, including a lead pharmacist. The teams' readiness activities clustered into five broad categories of readiness building strategies (e.g., building the operational infrastructure for service integration). Of the 34 strategies identified across sites, 68% were still in progress after 4 months. Engaging in the readiness process resulted in a number of outputs (e.g., data management systems) and benefits (e.g., an opportunity to ensure alignment of priorities and fit of the intervention). Based on the interviews, facilitators of the readiness process included assistance from a coach, internal support, and access to the readiness tools. Competing priorities and lack of resources, timely decision-making, and the timing of the readiness process were cited as barriers. The importance of service fit, stakeholder engagement, access to a structured approach, and rightsizing the readiness process emerged as lessons learned.
conclusionsThese findings provide valuable insights into the application of a readiness process. If readiness is to be integrated into routine practice as part of any implementation effort, it is critical to gain a better understanding of its application and value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.