Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885188›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2020

Optimizing the development and evaluation of complex interventions: lessons learned from the BetterBirth Program and associated trial.

Dale A Barnhart, Katherine E A Semrau, Corwin M Zigler, Rose L Molina, Megan Marx Delaney, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Donna Spiegelman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02148952 (A Matched-pair, Cluster Randomized Trial to Measure the Efficacy of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program on Severe Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Harm), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02148952 nacompletednot on this map

A Matched-pair, Cluster Randomized Trial to Measure the Efficacy of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program on Severe Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Harm

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled157,689ConditionsMaternal Death, Maternal Morbidity, Stillbirth, Neonatal DeathArmsWHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dale A BarnhartHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-0313
Katherine E A SemrauAriadne Labs, Boston, MA USA.
Corwin M ZiglerUniversity of Texas, Austin, TX USA.
Rose L MolinaAriadne Labs, Boston, MA USA.
Megan Marx DelaneyHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Lisa R HirschhornNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA.
Donna SpiegelmanHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.

Funding

Comprehensive Translational Science Analytics Tools for the Global Health AgendaDP1ES025459 · NIEHS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS DP1 ES025459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite extensive efforts to develop and refine intervention packages, complex interventions often fail to produce the desired health impacts in full-scale evaluations. A recent example of this phenomenon is BetterBirth, a complex intervention designed to implement the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist and improve maternal and neonatal health. Using data from the BetterBirth Program and its associated trial as a case study, we identified lessons to assist in the development and evaluation of future complex interventions.

methodsBetterBirth was refined across three sequential development phases prior to being tested in a matched-pair, cluster randomized trial in Uttar Pradesh, India. We reviewed published and internal materials from all three development phases to identify barriers hindering the identification of an optimal intervention package and identified corresponding lessons learned. For each lesson, we describe its importance and provide an example motivated by the BetterBirth Program's development to illustrate how it could be applied to future studies.

resultsWe identified three lessons: (1) develop a robust theory of change (TOC); (2) define optimization outcomes, which are used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention across development phases, and corresponding criteria for success, which determine whether the intervention has been sufficiently optimized to warrant full-scale evaluation; and (3) create and capture variation in the implementation intensity of components. When applying these lessons to the BetterBirth intervention, we demonstrate how a TOC could have promoted more complete data collection. We propose an optimization outcome and related criteria for success and illustrate how they could have resulted in additional development phases prior to the full-scale trial. Finally, we show how variation in components' implementation intensities could have been used to identify effective intervention components.

conclusionThese lessons learned can be applied during both early and advanced stages of complex intervention development and evaluation. By using examples from a real-world study to demonstrate the relevance of these lessons and illustrating how they can be applied in practice, we hope to encourage future researchers to collect and analyze data in a way that promotes more effective complex intervention development and evaluation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02148952; registered on May 29, 2014.

Indexed as

ChildbirthComplex interventionIndiaIntervention developmentWHO Safe Childbirth Checklist

Identifiers

PMID32885188
PMCPMC7427863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.