Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885182›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2020

Evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for pediatric patients with asthma in the emergency department.

Kelly Reeves, Katherine O'Hare, Lindsay Shade, Thomas Ludden, Andrew McWilliams, Melinda Manning, Melanie Hogg, Stacy Reynolds, Christopher M Shea, Elizabeth C Burton and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly ReevesDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0729-2192
Katherine O'HareDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Lindsay ShadeDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Thomas LuddenDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Andrew McWilliamsCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Atrium Health, Research Office Building, 1540 Garden Terrace, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA.
Melinda ManningDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Melanie HoggDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, 1000 Blythe Blvd., 306 Medical Education Building, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA.
Stacy ReynoldsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health, 1000 Blythe Blvd., 306 Medical Education Building, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA.
Christopher M SheaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Elizabeth C BurtonCommunity Care Partners, 1423 E. Franklin St., Suite A, Monroe, NC 28112 USA.
Melissa CalvertDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Diane M DerkowskiAtrium Health, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 600, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA.
Hazel TappDepartment of Family Medicine Research, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 400B Mercy Medical Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA.
Carolinas Medical Center · USAtrium Medical Cente · USCommunity Care Partners · USMercy Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is a difficult-to-manage chronic disease marked with associated outcome disparities including an increase rate of emergency department (ED) visits for uncontrolled asthma among patients who are most at-risk. Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which the patient and provider jointly make a healthcare choice. SDM improves patient outcomes; however, implementation barriers of time constraints and staff availability are limitations. The use of health IT solutions may increase the adoption of SDM, but best practices for implementation are not well understood. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a flexible comprehensive model used to identify barriers and facilitators influencing implementation. The goal of this study is to implement an innovative web-based pediatric SDM tool in the real-world setting of two large healthcare system EDs through the following aims: (1) convene a patient, research, and ED stakeholder advisory board to oversee review of protocol and study materials prior to implementation, (2) implement the SDM intervention where providers and staff will be trained to incorporate use of this SDM intervention, (3) conduct on-going evaluation of barriers, facilitators, and implementation outcomes to tailor implementation in the EDs, (4) evaluate patient-centered outcomes of primary care utilization and changes in ED visits and hospitalizations before and after the SDM intervention, and (5) understand and document best practices for ED implementation.

methodsThe CFIR model will guide the implementation evaluation. Researchers will administer surveys to the clinical team and patients at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months to inform implementation design, determine barriers and facilitators, and resource-needs to allow for real-time process adjustments within the EDs. Focus group or key-informant interviews and analysis will provide additional feedback to the stakeholder team to iterate the implementation process. Researchers will track patient-centered outcomes including increased primary care, ED, and inpatient utilization over the duration of the study. DISCUSSION: To advance asthma care and the field of implementation science, further research is needed to assess best practices for incorporating SDM into high-need healthcare settings such as the ED. This knowledge will facilitate improved outcomes and appropriate policy changes towards further use of SDM interventions in local and national acute care settings.

Indexed as

ImplementationInformation technologyInnovationPediatric asthmaShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32885182
PMCPMC7427946
OpenAlexW3030901020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.