Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885177›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2020

How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol.

Henna Hasson, Hedvig Gröndal, Åsa Hedberg Rundgren, Gunilla Avby, Håkan Uvhagen, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henna HassonProcome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-6841
Hedvig GröndalProcome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Åsa Hedberg RundgrenStockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stiftelsen Stockholms läns Äldrecentrum, Sveavägen 155, 113 46 Stockholm, Sweden.
Gunilla AvbyFoU Nordväst, Research and Development Center for social services in northwestern Stockholm County Council, Oppegårdsstråket 12, SE-191 86 Sollentuna, Sweden.
Håkan UvhagenProcome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrica von Thiele SchwarzProcome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm County Council · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEStockholm Gerontology Research Center Foundation · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is a basic premise of contemporary social services (e.g., child and family social services). However, EBIs seldom fit seamlessly into a specific setting but often need to be adapted. Although some adaptions might be necessary, they can cause interventions to be less effective or even unsafe. The challenge of balancing adherence and adaptations when using EBIs is often referred to as the adherence and adaptation dilemma. Although the current literature identifies professionals' management of this dilemma as problematic, it offers little practical guidance for professionals. This research aims to investigate how the adherence and adaptation dilemma is handled in social services and to explore how structured decision support can impact the management of the dilemma.

methodsThe design is a prospective, longitudinal intervention with a focus on the feasibility and usefulness of the structured decision support. The project is a collaboration between academic researchers, embedded researchers at three research and development units, and social service organizations. A multi-method data collection will be employed. Initially, a scoping review will be performed, and the results will be used in the development of a structured decision support. The decision support will be further developed and tested during a series of workshops with social service professionals. Different forms of data-focus group interviews, questionnaires, and documentation-will be used on several occasions to evaluate the impact of the structured decision support. Qualitative and quantitative analysis will be performed and usefulness for practice prioritized throughout the study. DISCUSSION: The study will contribute with knowledge on how the adherence and adaption dilemma is handled and experienced by social service professionals. Most importantly, the study will generate rich empirical data on how a structured decision support impacts professionals' management of adherence and adaptions. The goal is to produce more strategic and context-sensitive implementation of EBIs in social service, which will increase value for service users.

Indexed as

AdaptionAdaption-adherence dilemmaAdherenceDecision supportEvidence-based interventionsEvidence-based practiceSocial servicesSocial work

Identifiers

PMID32885177
PMCPMC7427905
OpenAlexW3013186766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.