Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885121›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Correlated activity favors synergistic processing in local cortical networks in vitro at synaptically relevant timescales.

Samantha P Sherrill, Nicholas M Timme, John M Beggs, Ehren L Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Measure of Synergy Based on Union Information.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Information-processing dynamics in neural networks of macaque cerebral cortex reflect cognitive state and behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergence as the conversion of information: a unifying theory.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samantha P SherrillDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2894-7138
Nicholas M TimmeDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John M BeggsDepartment of Physics & Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Ehren L NewmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN INTEGRATIVE DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESST32HD007475 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LINDA B. SMITH · 1995 to 2026
$9.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural information processing is widely understood to depend on correlations in neuronal activity. However, whether correlation is favorable or not is contentious. Here, we sought to determine how correlated activity and information processing are related in cortical circuits. Using recordings of hundreds of spiking neurons in organotypic cultures of mouse neocortex, we asked whether mutual information between neurons that feed into a common third neuron increased synergistic information processing by the receiving neuron. We found that mutual information and synergistic processing were positively related at synaptic timescales (0.05-14 ms), where mutual information values were low. This effect was mediated by the increase in information transmission-of which synergistic processing is a component-that resulted as mutual information grew. However, at extrasynaptic windows (up to 3,000 ms), where mutual information values were high, the relationship between mutual information and synergistic processing became negative. In this regime, greater mutual information resulted in a disproportionate increase in redundancy relative to information transmission. These results indicate that the emergence of synergistic processing from correlated activity differs according to timescale and correlation regime. In a low-correlation regime, synergistic processing increases with greater correlation, and in a high-correlation regime, synergistic processing decreases with greater correlation.

Indexed as

ComputationCorrelated activityCortexEffective connectivityInformation theoryIn vitro networksNeural information processingSynergy

Identifiers

PMID32885121
PMCPMC7462423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.