Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885058›Full record

ArticleParasite epidemiology and control2020

Knowledge and perception on ticks and tick-borne diseases among veterinary medicine students from the North African countries of Algeria, Egypt, and Tunisia.

Médiha Khamassi Khbou, Ouarda Ayadi, Amira Adel Al-Hosary, Mohamed Aziz Darghouth, Mohamed Gharbi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Médiha Khamassi KhbouLaboratory of Infectious Animal Diseases, Zoonosis, and Sanitary Regulation, Univ. Manouba, Institution of Agricultural Research and Higher Education, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, Sidi Thabet 2020, Tunisia.
Ouarda AyadiLaboratoire PADESCA, Institut des Sciences Vétérinaires, El Khroub, Université des Frères Mentouri-Constantine 1, Algeria.
Amira Adel Al-HosaryDepartment of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, P.O. Box 71526, Egypt.
Mohamed Aziz DarghouthLaboratory of Parasitology, Univ. Manouba, Institution of Agricultural Research and Higher Education, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, Sidi Thabet 2020, Tunisia.
Mohamed GharbiLaboratory of Parasitology, Univ. Manouba, Institution of Agricultural Research and Higher Education, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, Sidi Thabet 2020, Tunisia.
Assiut University · EGConstantine 1 University · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are important vectors of both animal and human pathogens. The epidemiology of tick-borne diseases (TBDs) has dramatically changed in several regions in the world. As parasitology is a continuously growing field, assessing the knowledge of veterinary medicine students provides useful indicators and information on the level of intervention required to adapt parasitological courses to meet the demands in a changing world. This study aimed to assess, in three North African veterinary education establishments, the basic parasitology knowledge of veterinary medicine students. Such a study is essential to build up core competencies regarding ticks and TBDs, and to suggest suitable adjustment measures to parasitology courses. The present study was based on a self-administered and anonymous questionnaire on ticks and TBDs basic knowledge and perception. The survey was completed by 558 veterinary medicine students in Algeria, Egypt, and Tunisia in 2018. The students were divided into two groups: the "before" group - students who had not yet completed the parasitology course, and the "after" group - students who had already completed it. In all studied countries, the "after" students' group gave significantly more correct answers (83.16%) than the "before" students' group (16.84%) (

Indexed as

KnowledgeNorth AfricaParasitologyPerceptionStudentsTicks

Identifiers

PMID32885058
PMCPMC7452104
OpenAlexW3046778627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.