Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32885036›Full record

ArticleJournal of technology in behavioral science2017

Machine Learning for Identifying Emotional Expression in Text: Improving the Accuracy of Established Methods.

Erin O Bantum, Noémie Elhadad, Jason E Owen, Shaodian Zhang, Mitch Golant, Joanne Buzaglo, Joanne Stephen, Janine Giese-Davis

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Erin O BantumUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center; Cancer Prevention & Control Program.
Noémie ElhadadColumbia University; Biomedical Informatics.
Jason E OwenVA Palo Alto Health Care System; Dissemination & Training Division.
Shaodian ZhangColumbia University; Biomedical Informatics.
Mitch GolantCancer Support Community.
Joanne BuzagloCancer Support Community.
Joanne StephenAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Janine Giese-DavisUniversity of Calgary; Cumming School of Medicine; Department of Oncology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Columbia University · USThe Red Door Community · USAlberta Health Services · CACancer Center of Hawaii · USUniversity of Calgary · CAVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

USE OF NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TO IDENTIFY LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF COPINGR21CA143642 · NCI · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI BANTUM, ERIN O'CARROLL, ELHADAD, NOEMIE · 2010 to 2011
$385k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA143642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of emotion has been linked to numerous critical and beneficial aspects of human functioning. Accurately capturing emotional expression in text grows in relevance as people continue to spend more time in an online environment. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) is a commonly used program for the identification of many constructs, including emotional expression. In an earlier study (Bantum & Owen, 2009) LIWC was demonstrated to have good sensitivity yet poor positive predictive value. The goal of the current study was to create an automated machine learning technique to mimic manual coding. The sample included online support groups, cancer discussion boards, and transcripts from an expressive writing study, which resulted in 39,367 sentence-level coding decisions. In examining the entire sample the machine learning approach outperformed LIWC, in all categories outside of Sensitivity for negative emotion (LIWC Sensitivity = .85; Machine Learning Sensitivity = .41), although LIWC does not take into consideration prosocial emotion, such as affection, interest, and validation. LIWC performed significantly better than the machine learning approach when removing the prosocial emotions (

Indexed as

canceremotional expressionlinguistic analysismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID32885036
PMCPMC7467127
OpenAlexW2604594075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.