Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884971›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2020

Surena Namdari, Thema Nicholson, Javad Parvizi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Concordance of three different methods to obtain samples for culture in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Preventing Infections in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Surena NamdariRothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thema NicholsonRothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Javad ParviziRothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven high rates of positive

methodsBetween April 2017 and May 2017 swabs were taken during primary shoulder arthroplasty. After surgical time out, using sterile gloves, a sterile swab was opened and exposed to the air for 5 seconds, returned to its contained, and sealed. One swab was sent to our institution's microbiology laboratory for aerobic and anaerobic culture and held for 13 days. The other sample was sent for NGS (MicroGen Dx, Lubbock, TX), where samples were amplified for pyrosequencing using a forward and reverse fusion primer and matched against a DNA library for species identification.

resultsFor 40 consecutive cases, swabs were sent for culture and NGS.

conclusionWe demonstrate that the two most commonly cultured organisms (

Indexed as

Cutibacterium acneshoulder surgeryir swabsnfectionultures

Identifiers

PMID32884971
PMCPMC7443066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.