ArticleCureus2020
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulant for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 75-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and anticoagulant therapy presented with a headache. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) was diagnosed after MRI of the brain revealed cortical superficial siderosis, lobar intracerebral hemorrhage, and lobar microbleeds. Anticoagulant therapy was carefully discontinued. Several years later, he was admitted with sudden onset left upper-extremity weakness. In addition to CAA bleeding lesions, a diffusion-weighted brain MRI showed multiple infarct lesions of high signal intensity. The administration of edoxaban 7.5 mg/day (later increased up to 30 mg/day) prevented ischemic stroke recurrence without exacerbation of cerebral bleeding. This could indicate that CAA patients with AF who had previous adverse effects from warfarin can safely use newer direct oral anticoagulants, such as edoxaban, to prevent ischemic stroke without danger of cerebral hemorrhage. The superiority of edoxaban as compared with warfarin might be due to its antioxidant effect because vascular oxidative stress plays a causal role in CAA-induced cerebrovascular dysfunction, CAA-induced cerebral hemorrhage, and CAA formation itself. We explained the beneficial effect of edoxaban for CAA by the mechanism of oxidative stress in the paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.