Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884833›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2020

Perception, pattern of use, partner support and determinants of uptake of family planning methods among women in rural communities in Southeast Nigeria.

Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike, Ugochukwu Chinyem Madubueze, Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex, Chika Julius Anyigor, Benedict Ndubueze Azuogu, Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo, Chinyere Ojiugo Mbachu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ifeyinwa Chizoba AkamikeDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-6377
Ugochukwu Chinyem MadubuezeDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria.
Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-AlexDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria.
Chika Julius AnyigorDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria.
Benedict Ndubueze AzuoguDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria.
Chukwuma David UmeokonkwoDepartment of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria.
Chinyere Ojiugo MbachuDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki · NGUniversity of Nigeria · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily planning is a cost-effective strategy for achieving population development. Family planning uptake is low in sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. We assessed the perception, pattern of use, partner support and determinants of uptake of family planning methods among married women of reproductive age in rural communities of Ebonyi state.

methodsThis is part of a baseline report of a quasi-experimental study. A total of 484 married women of reproductive age were recruited using multistage sampling method. Four focus group discussions (men and women) and pre-tested semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect information from the participants. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 software and thematic analysis. Chi-square test and logistic regression were carried out at 5% significance level.

resultsOnly 26.2% of respondents were currently using any method of family planning. The most commonly used method was the natural method (57%). Amongst those who reported using artificial methods, 32.7% used condoms, 27.3% used implant while 23.64 and 16.4% used injectables and pills respectively. Predictors of current use of any family planning method were: older age (AOR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.01-3.00), having more than five children (AOR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.05-2.83), minimum of secondary level of education for respondent (AOR = 3.3, CI = 1.60-6.96) and their husband/partner (AOR = 2.0, 95%CI = 1.05-3.92). Qualitative findings showed that only few families were using a method of family planning and those who did not practice family planning perceived it to interfere with God's plan for fruitfulness and to be counter-productive to household income due to decreased manpower for agricultural activities. Poor partner involvement and support for family planning was also cited as a deterrent by both male and female participants.

conclusionsPerception and use of family planning methods is poor in rural communities of Ebonyi state. Improving uptake of family planning methods in these rural communities will require proper demographic targeting as well as debunking fatalistic views, and cultural and religious myths around family planning.

Indexed as

DeterminantsFamily planningPartner supportPattern of usePerception

Identifiers

PMID32884833
PMCPMC7461266
OpenAlexW3081937817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.