Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884747›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2020

Distinct macrophage phenotypes skewed by local granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) are associated with tissue destruction and intimal hyperplasia in giant cell arteritis.

William F Jiemy, Yannick van Sleen, Kornelis Sm van der Geest, Hilde A Ten Berge, Wayel H Abdulahad, Maria Sandovici, Annemieke Mh Boots, Peter Heeringa, Elisabeth Brouwer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mature CD209Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

William F JiemyDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7712-3576
Yannick van SleenDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Kornelis Sm van der GeestDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Hilde A Ten BergeDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Wayel H AbdulahadDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Maria SandoviciDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Annemieke Mh BootsDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Peter HeeringaDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Elisabeth BrouwerDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the presence and spatial distribution of different macrophage phenotypes, governed by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) skewing signals, in giant cell arteritis (GCA) lesions.

methodsTemporal artery biopsies (TABs,

resultsA distinct spatial distribution pattern of macrophage phenotypes in TABs was identified. CD206

conclusionsOur data document a distinct spatial distribution pattern of CD206

Indexed as

giant cell arteritisgranulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factormacrophage colony‐stimulating factormacrophagesvasculitis

Identifiers

PMID32884747
PMCPMC7453134
OpenAlexW3081544860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.