Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32884612›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2020

Modern urbanization has reshaped the bacterial microbiome profiles of house dust in domestic environments.

Yifan Shan, Jing Guo, Wei Fan, Huijun Li, Hui Wu, Yong Song, Geoffrey Jalleh, Weidong Wu, Guicheng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The potential importance of the built-environment microbiome and its impact on human health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yifan ShanSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, 4353003, P.R. China.
Jing GuoSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Wei FanHenan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, P.R. China.
Huijun LiSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, 4353003, P.R. China.
Hui WuSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, 4353003, P.R. China.
Yong SongSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Geoffrey JallehSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Weidong WuSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, 4353003, P.R. China.
Guicheng ZhangSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of allergy and other common chronic diseases is higher in developed than developing countries, and higher in urban than rural regions. Urbanization through its modification of environmental microbiomes may play a predominant role in the development of these conditions. However, no studies have been conducted to compare the microbiome in house dust among areas with different urbanization levels.

methodsHouse dust from Xinxiang rural area (XR, n = 74), Xinxiang urban area (XU, n = 33), and Zhengzhou urban area (ZU, n = 32) in central China, and from Australia (AU, n = 58 [with pets AUP, n = 15, without pets AUNP, n = 43]) were collected during a summer season in China and Australia. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA was employed to profile house dust bacterial communities.

resultsSettled dust collected in China was dominant with 2 bacterial phyla: Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, while floor dust collected in Australia had a higher proportion of phylum Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. XR dust samples presented higher bacterial richness and diversity compared with XU or ZU samples. Urbanization level (r

conclusionThere was a significant difference in house dust microbiota among different urbanization areas. The areas with a lower urbanization level presented higher dust-borne bacterial richness and diversity. Modern urbanization has a significant influence on the bacterial microbiome profiles of indoor dust.

Indexed as

House dust bacteriaLevel of urbanizationOccupantsPet

Identifiers

PMID32884612
PMCPMC7451671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.