ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2020
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Method for evaluation of Streptomyces growth and metabolism in the presence of glyphosate-based herbicide.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Identification and genomic analysis of a thermophilic bacterial strain that reduces ammonia loss from composting.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Hybrid-genome sequence analysis of Enterobacter cloacae FACU and morphological characterization: insights into a highly arsenic-resistant strain.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Article
- Omics technology draws a comprehensive heavy metal resistance strategy in bacteria.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Degradation kinetics and physiological studies of organophosphates degrading microorganisms for soil bioremediation.Stress biology · 2024Article
- Physiochemical analyses and molecular characterization of heavy metal-resistant bacteria from Ilesha gold mining sites in Nigeria.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Biodegradation of isoproturon by Escherichia coli expressing a Pseudomonas putida catechol 1,2-dioxygenase gene.AMB Express · 2023Article
- Effects of a Microbial Restoration Substrate on Plant Growth and Rhizosphere Microbial Community in a Continuous Cropping Poplar.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Draft genome of Raoultella planticola, a high lead resistance bacterium from industrial wastewater.AMB Express · 2023Article
- Draft genome analysis forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Unlocking the potential of glyphosate-resistant bacterial strains in biodegradation and maize growth.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Glyphosate Pollution Treatment and Microbial Degradation Alternatives, a Review.Microorganisms · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glyphosate is a commonly used organophosphate herbicide that has an adverse impact on humans, mammals and soil microbial ecosystems. The redundant utilize of glyphosate to control weed growth cause the pollution of the soil environment by this chemical. The discharge of glyphosate in the agricultural drainage can also cause serious environmental damage and water pollution problems. Therefore, it is important to develop methods for enhancing glyphosate degradation in the soil through bioremediation. In this study, thirty bacterial isolates were selected from an agro-industrial zone located in Sadat City of Monufia Governorate, Egypt. The isolates were able to grow in LB medium supplemented with 7.2 mg/ml glyphosate. Ten isolates only had the ability to grow in a medium containing different concentrations of glyphosate (50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/ml). The FACU3 bacterial isolate showed the highest CFU in the different concentrations of glyphosate. The FACU3 isolate was Gram-positive, spore-forming and rod-shape bacteria. Based on API 50 CHB/E medium kit, biochemical properties and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.